Intel Core i3 N305 vs Celeron N5095

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 0 GHz Intel Core i3 N305 with 8-cores against the 2.0 GHz Celeron N5095 with 4-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating

Key Differences

What are the key differences between N5095 and N305
Advantages of Intel Core i3 N305
  • Newer - released 2-years later
  • 2.5x faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 1277 vs 504 points
  • Has 4 more physical cores
  • Has 2048 KB larger L3 cache size
Promotion

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench R23

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
1021
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Core i3 N305 +104%
4435

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Core i3 N305 +153%
1277
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Core i3 N305 +237%
4859
File compression 450.9 MB/sec 170.3 MB/sec
Clang compilation 28.3 Klines/sec 15.1 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 126.7 pages/sec 52 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 151.5 Mpixels/sec 65.7 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 148.2 pages/sec 99.3 pages/sec
Background blur 22.4 images/sec 4.94 images/sec
Photo processing 37.3 images/sec 7.97 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.01 Mpixels/sec 2.43 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
2284
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Core i3 N305 +151%
10302
Integer math 35.2 GOps/sec 12.9 GOps/sec
Floating point math 23.3 GOps/sec 8.3 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 28M Primes/sec 14M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 15.5M Strings/sec 7.8M Strings/sec
Data encryption 8.4 GBytes/sec 3.2 GBytes/sec
Data compression 114.6 MBytes/sec 55.2 MBytes/sec
Physics 648 Frames/sec 292 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 5.8B Matrices/sec 1.5B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4]

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i3 N305 and Celeron N5095

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released January 3, 2023 January 1, 2021
Type Laptop Laptop
instruction set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Alder Lake Jasper Lake
Model number i3-N305 N5095
Integrated GPU UHD Graphics (32EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores - 4
P-Threads - 4
Base Frequency (P) 0 GHz 2.0 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 8 -
E-Threads 8 -
Base Frequency (E) 1.8 GHz -
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 3.9 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 8 4
Total Threads 8 4
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 18x 20x
L1 Cache 96K (per core) -
L2 Cache 2MB (shared) 384K (per core)
L3 Cache 6MB (shared) 4MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication process 10 nm 10 nm
TDP (PL1) 9-15 W (configurable) 15 W
Socket BGA-1744 BGA-1338
Peak temperature 105°C 105°C

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics (32EU) Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 350 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1250 MHz 750 MHz
Shading Units 256 256
TMUs 16 16
ROPs 8 8
Execution Units 32 16
TGP 45 W 6 W
iGPU FLOPS
0.74 TFLOPS
0.24 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory types - DDR5-4800
- DDR4-3200
- LPDDR5-4800
- DDR4-2933
- LPDDR4x-2933
Memory Size 16 GB 16 GB
Max. Memory Channels 1 2
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official site Intel Core i3 N305 official page Intel Celeron N5095 official page
PCI Express Version 3.0 3.0
PCI Express Lanes 9 8

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Celeron N5095 or Core i3 N305?
Promotion