Razer Blade Pro 17 (2021) vs ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706
You can select specific configurations for the laptops to get a more accurate comparative review
Review
Performance
System and application performance
Gaming
Performance in popular 3D games
Display
Viewing angle, color accuracy, brightness
Battery Life
Potential battery life in light and average use
Connectivity
Ports, webcam and other interfaces
Case
Design, materials, durability and usability
NanoReview Score
Key Differences
Advantages of the Razer Blade Pro 17 (2021)
- Higher screen refresh rate: 165 versus 60 Hz
- Higher number of cutting-edge USB Type-C ports: 2 versus 1
- Thinner bezels and 4% higher screen-to-body ratio
- 34% sharper screen – 170 versus 127 pixels per inch (PPI)
Advantages of the ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706
- Slightly easier to carry: weighs 150 grams less (around 0.33 lbs)
- Features a bigger (~28%) battery – 90 against 70.5 watt-hours
Tests and Specifications
Comparison table of test results and technical specsCase
Weight | 2.75 kg (6.06 lbs) | 2.6 kg (5.73 lbs) |
Width | 395 mm (15.55 inches) | 399.2 mm (15.72 inches) |
Height | 260 mm (10.24 inches) | 268.9 mm (10.59 inches) |
Thickness | 19.9 mm (0.78 inches) | 24.8 mm (0.98 inches) |
Area | 1027 cm2 (159.2 inches2) | 1073 cm2 (166.5 inches2) |
Screen-to-body ratio | ~80.3% | ~76.9% |
Side bezels | 6 mm | 8.1 mm |
Colors | Black | Black, Gray |
Transformer | No | No |
Cooling system | Active | Active |
Vapor chamber | Yes | No |
Number of fans | 2 | 2 |
Display
Size | 17.3 inches | 17.3 inches |
Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 60 Hz |
PPI | 170 ppi | 127 ppi |
Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Resolution | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels |
HDR support | No | No |
Touchscreen | No | No |
Coating | Matte | Matte |
sRGB color space | 100% | - |
Response time | 3 ms | - |
Max. brightness
Battery
Capacity
Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
Replaceable | No | No |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
USB Power Delivery | Yes | Yes |
Charging port position | Left | Left |
Charge power | 230 W | 200 W |
Sound
Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Power | - | 2x2W |
Dolby Atmos | Yes | - |
Microphones | 2 | 2 |
Connectivity
Wi-Fi standard | v6 | v6 |
Bluetooth | v5.2 | v5.2 |
Fingerprint | No | No |
Optical drive | No | No |
Webcam | Above the display | Above the display |
Webcam resolution | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 |
USB Type-C | 2x USB 3.2 | 1x USB 3.2 |
USB-A | 3x USB 3.2 | 3x USB 3.2 |
HDMI | 1x HDMI 2.1 | 1x HDMI 2.0 |
DisplayPort | No | No |
VGA | No | No |
Audio jack (3.5 mm) | Yes | Yes |
Ethernet (RJ45) | Yes | Yes |
SD card reader | Yes | No |
Proprietary charging port | Yes | Yes |
Input
Keyboard type | Island | Island |
Numpad | No | Yes |
Backlight | Yes | Yes |
Surface | Glass | Plastic |
Windows Precision | Yes | Yes |
CPU
CPU name
Base frequency | 2.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
Turbo frequency | 5.1 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
Cores | 8 | 6 |
Threads | 16 | 12 |
L3 Cache | 16 MB | 16 MB |
Integrated GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
Fabrication process | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Graphics Card
GPU name
Type | Dedicated | Dedicated |
Fabrication process | 8 nm | 8 nm |
GPU base clock | 816-1387 MHz | 816-1387 MHz |
GPU boost clock | 1283-1703 MHz | 1283-1703 MHz |
FLOPS | 10.94 TFLOPS | 10.94 TFLOPS |
Memory size | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Memoty type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Memory bus | 192 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock | 1750 MHz (Effective - 12000-14000 MHz) | 1750 MHz (Effective - 12000-14000 MHz) |
Shading units | 3840 | 3840 |
DirectX support | 12 | 12 |
Max. resolution | 3840x2160 - 60 Hz | 3840x2160 - 60 Hz |
RAM
RAM size
Channels | 2x8 GB | 2x16 GB |
Clock | 2933 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Type | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Upgradable | Yes | Yes |
Total slots | 2 | 2 |
Max. ram size | 64 GB | 32 GB |
Storage
Storage size
Storage type | SSD (M2) | SSD (M2) |
Channels | 1x512 GB | 1x512 GB |
Upgradable | Yes | Yes |
Total slots | 2 | 1 |
NVMe | Yes | Yes |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 1