Oppo Reno 8 Pro vs Find X5 Pro
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.7-inch Oppo Reno 8 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max) that was released on May 23, 2022, against the Oppo Find X5 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and came out 3 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 8 Pro
- Shows 7% longer battery life (31:36 vs 29:24 hours)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- More recent OS version: Android 13 versus 12.1
- Weighs 35 grams less
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X5 Pro
- Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
- The rear camera has a 2x optical zoom
- 43% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1004K versus 701K)
- Better camera quality (According to DxOMark rating)
- 33% higher pixel density (525 vs 394 PPI)
- Handles wireless charging up to 50W
- Optical image stabilization
- Comes with 500 mAh larger battery capacity: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Choose the importance of each parameter to more accurately identify the smartphone that best meets your particular needs.
Value for money
You can enter your local prices of these phones (in USD or other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money.
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
Size | 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels | 1440 x 3216 pixels |
Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
PPI | 394 ppi | 525 ppi |
Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
Max rated brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
Max rated brightness in HDR | 1300 nits | 1300 nits |
HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Gorilla Glass Victus |
Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 89.6% |
Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
RGB color space | - | 98.1% |
PWM | - | 361 Hz |
Response time | - | 1 ms |
Contrast | - | ∞ Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
Height | 161.2 mm (6.35 inches) | 163.7 mm (6.44 inches) |
Width | 74.2 mm (2.92 inches) | 73.9 mm (2.91 inches) |
Thickness | 7.34 mm (0.29 inches) | 8.5 mm (0.33 inches) |
Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 218 g (7.69 oz) |
Waterproof | No | IP68 |
Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
Rear material | Glass | Ceramic |
Frame material | Metal | Metal |
Colors | Black, Green | White, Black, Blue |
Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
Max clock | 2850 MHz | 3000 MHz |
CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A710 - 1 core at 3 GHz: Cortex-X2 |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 6 MB |
Lithography process | 5 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
Graphics | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 730 |
GPU clock | 860 MHz | 818 MHz |
FLOPS | ~1309 GFLOPS | ~2513 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
AnTuTu Benchmark 9
CPU | 174127 | 233641 |
GPU | 262545 | 443346 |
Memory | 138623 | 174280 |
UX | 131897 | 159010 |
Total score | 701869 | 1004877 |
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Max surface temperature | - | 39.7 °C |
Stability | 99% | 63% |
Graphics test | 34 FPS | 56 FPS |
Graphics score | 5794 | 9495 |
Web score | 9036 | 9323 |
Video editing | 5275 | 5923 |
Photo editing | 18823 | 25591 |
Data manipulation | 9249 | 9248 |
Writing score | 18530 | 16695 |
AnTuTu 9 Results (186th and 63rd place)
Memory
RAM size | 8, 12 GB | 8, 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
Memory clock | 3200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Channels | 4 | 4 |
Storage size | 256 GB | 256, 512 GB |
Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Memory card | No | No |
Software
Operating system | Android 12 (Can be upgraded to Android 13) | Android 12.1 |
ROM | ColorOS 13 | ColorOS 12.1 |
OS size | - | 24.1 GB |
Battery
Capacity | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Max charge power | 80 W | 80 W |
Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
Replaceable | No | No |
Wireless charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
Reverse charging | Yes | Yes, (wireless) |
Fast charging | Yes (90% in 30 min) | Yes (91% in 30 min) |
Full charging time | 0:42 hr | 0:40 hr |
Web browsing | 10:31 hr | 10:35 hr |
Watching video | 14:06 hr | 14:34 hr |
Gaming | 06:12 hr | 05:57 hr |
Standby | 105 hr | 80 hr |
General battery life
Camera
Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8700 x 5800 |
Zoom | Digital | Optical, 2x |
Flash | Dual LED | LED |
Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
8K video recording | No | No |
4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 60FPS |
1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
Slow motion | 960 FPS (720p) | 480 FPS (720p) |
Angle of widest lens | 112° | 110° |
Lenses | 3 (50 MP + 8 MP + 2 MP) | 3 (50 MP + 13 MP + 50 MP) |
Wide (main) lens | - 50 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 23 mm - Pixel size: 1 micron - Sensor: 1/1.56", Sony IMX766 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Phase autofocus |
- 50 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Pixel size: 1 micron - Sensor: 1/1.56", Sony IMX766 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Phase autofocus - Optical stabilization |
Telephoto lens | - | - 13 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 - Focal length: 52 mm - Pixel size: 1 micron - Sensor: 1/3.4", Samsung S5K3M5 (ISOCELL CMOS) - Phase autofocus |
Ultra-wide lens | - 8 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Focal length: 16 mm - Pixel size: 1.12 micron - Sensor: 1/4", Sony IMX355 (Exmor-RS CMOS) |
- 50 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Pixel size: 1 micron - Sensor: 1/1.56", Sony IMX766 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Phase autofocus |
Macro lens | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 |
- |
Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
Samples | Photo samples of Oppo Reno 8 Pro from DxOMark | Photo samples of Oppo Find X5 Pro from DxOMark |
Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
Image resolution | 6528 x 3680 | 6560 x 4928 |
Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
Focal length | 24 mm | 21 mm |
Pixel size | 0.8 microns | 0.8 microns |
Sensor type | Exmor-RS CMOS | Exmor-RS CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.74" | 1/2.74" |
Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
DxOMark camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic camera score
Connectivity
Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
NFC* | Yes | Yes |
Infrared port | No | No |
Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
eSIM support* | No | Yes |
Hybrid slot | No | No |
LTE Cat* | - | 20 |
5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
Headphone audio jack | No | No |
FM radio | No | No |
Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
Category | Flagship | Flagship |
Announced | May 2022 | February 2022 |
Release date | June 2022 | March 2022 |
Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
Bundled charger | Yes, 80 W | Yes, 80 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Oppo Find X5 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 119