Samsung Galaxy A50 vs Galaxy A30
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.4-inch Samsung Galaxy A50 (with Exynos 7 Octa 9610) that was released on February 25, 2019, against the Samsung Galaxy A30, which is powered by Exynos 7 Octa 7904. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A50
- 18% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (206K versus 174K)
- More energy-efficient CPU – Exynos 7 Octa 9610
- Slow-motion recording at 240FPS
- Faster storage type - UFS 2.1 versus eMMC 5.1
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Choose the importance of each parameter to more accurately identify the smartphone that best meets your particular needs.
Value for money
You can enter your local prices of these phones (in USD or other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money.
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
Type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
Size | 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels | 1080 x 2340 pixels |
Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
PPI | 403 ppi | 403 ppi |
Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
Max rated brightness | 650 nits | 616 nits |
HDR support | No | No |
Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
Screen-to-body ratio | 85.2% | 84.9% |
Display features | - Always-On Display | - Always-On Display |
RGB color space | 141.5% | - |
PWM | 119 Hz | - |
Response time | 7 ms | - |
Contrast | ∞ Infinity | - |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
Height | 158.5 mm (6.24 inches) | 158.5 mm (6.24 inches) |
Width | 74.7 mm (2.94 inches) | 74.7 mm (2.94 inches) |
Thickness | 7.7 mm (0.3 inches) | 7.7 mm (0.3 inches) |
Weight | 166 g (5.86 oz) | 165 g (5.82 oz) |
Waterproof | No | No |
Rear material | Plastic | Plastic |
Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
Colors | White, Black, Blue | White, Black, Blue |
Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, rear |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
Chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 |
Max clock | 2300 MHz | 1800 MHz |
CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.7 GHz: Cortex-A53 - 4 cores at 2.3 GHz: Cortex-A73 |
- 6 cores at 1.6 GHz: Cortex-A53 - 2 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A73 |
Lithography process | 10 nanometers | 14 nanometers |
Graphics | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G71 MP2 |
GPU clock | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
FLOPS | ~259 GFLOPS | ~65 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
AnTuTu Benchmark 9
CPU | 57838 | 55088 |
GPU | 42521 | 28006 |
Memory | 35443 | 36707 |
UX | 71687 | 56023 |
Total score | 206625 | 174894 |
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Max surface temperature | 44.5 °C | - |
Stability | 97% | 97% |
Graphics test | 4 FPS | 2 FPS |
Graphics score | 746 | 404 |
PCMark 3.0
Web score | 4616 | - |
Video editing | 4569 | - |
Photo editing | 8611 | - |
Data manipulation | 5432 | - |
Writing score | 6583 | - |
Memory
RAM size | 4, 6 GB | 3, 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Channels | 2 | 2 |
Storage size | 64, 128 GB | 32, 64 GB |
Storage type | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Memory card max size | Up to 512 GB | Up to 512 GB |
Software
Operating system | Android 9.0 (Can be upgraded to Android 11) | Android 9.0 (Can be upgraded to Android 11) |
ROM | One UI 3.1 | One UI 3.1 |
OS size | 22 GB | 11.2 GB |
Battery
Capacity | 4000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
Max charge power | 15 W | 15 W |
Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
Replaceable | No | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Reverse charging | No | No |
Fast charging | Yes, Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge (40% in 35 min) | Yes, Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge (40% in 30 min) |
Full charging time | 1:50 hr | 1:50 hr |
Web browsing | 08:49 hr | 08:50 hr |
Watching video | 12:19 hr | 11:37 hr |
Gaming | 04:33 hr | 05:35 hr |
Standby | 84 hr | 86 hr |
General battery life
Camera
Matrix | 25 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Image resolution | 5288 x 3968 | 4616 x 3464 |
Zoom | Digital | Digital |
Flash | LED | LED |
Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
8K video recording | No | No |
4K video recording | No | No |
1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
Slow motion | 240 FPS (720p) | 120 FPS (720p) |
Angle of widest lens | 123° | 123° |
Lenses | 3 (25 MP + 8 MP + 5 MP) | 2 (16 MP + 5 MP) |
Wide (main) lens | - 25 MP - Aperture: f/1.7 - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: 0.9 micron - Sensor: 1/2.78", Sony IMX576 (BSI CMOS) - Phase autofocus |
- 16 MP - Aperture: f/1.7 - Focal length: 27 mm - Phase autofocus |
Ultra-wide lens | - 8 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Focal length: 13 mm - Pixel size: 1.12 micron - Sensor: 1/4.0" (CMOS) |
- 5 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Focal length: 12 mm |
Depth lens | - 5 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 |
- |
Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Pro mode |
Samples | Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy A50 from DxOMark | - |
Megapixels | 25 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Image resolution | 6024 x 4024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
Focal length | 25 mm | 26 mm |
Pixel size | 0.9 microns | 1 microns |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.8" | 1/3.06" |
Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
DxOMark camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic camera score
Connectivity
Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
Bluetooth features | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP |
USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
USB version | 2 | 2 |
USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou |
NFC* | Yes | Yes |
Infrared port | No | No |
Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
eSIM support* | No | No |
Hybrid slot | No | No |
LTE Cat* | 12 | 10 |
5G support | No | No |
Sound
Speakers | Mono | Mono |
Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes |
FM radio | Yes | Yes |
Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
Announced | February 2019 | February 2019 |
Release date | March 2019 | March 2019 |
SAR (head) | 0.27 W/kg | 0.25 W/kg |
SAR (body) | 1.39 W/kg | 1.17 W/kg |
Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Hall-effect sensor - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Samsung Galaxy A50. It has a better display, camera, performance, gaming, and sound.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 297