Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Nokia X20
Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.5-inch Samsung Galaxy A52 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G) that was released on March 17, 2021, against the Nokia X20, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 and came out 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A52
- Waterproof body (IP67 classification)
- Higher display refresh rate – 90 Hz
- Delivers 28% higher peak brightness (797 against 622 nits)
- Optical image stabilization
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Stereo speakers
- Slow-motion recording at 240FPS
- Super AMOLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
We may receive a commission from Amazon for purchases made using the links below, but this has no bearing on our assessment methodology.
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Performance
CPU/GPU performance in apps and games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview score
Final comparison evaluation
Value for money
You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money.
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
Type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
Size | 6.5 inches | 6.67 inches |
Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1080 x 2400 pixels |
Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
PPI | 407 ppi | 395 ppi |
Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
Max rated brightness | 400 nits | 450 nits |
HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | No |
Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 79.8% |
Display features | - Always-On Display | - |
RGB color space | 99.3% | 98.7% |
PWM | 183 Hz | - |
Response time | 4.4 ms | 30.5 ms |
Contrast | ∞ Infinity | 923:1 |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
Height | 159.9 mm (6.3 inches) | 168.9 mm (6.65 inches) |
Width | 75.1 mm (2.96 inches) | 79.7 mm (3.14 inches) |
Thickness | 8.4 mm (0.33 inches) | 9.1 mm (0.36 inches) |
Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 220 g (7.76 oz) |
Waterproof | IP67 | IPX2 |
Rear material | Plastic | Plastic |
Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
Colors | White, Black, Blue, Pink | Gold, Blue |
Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in home button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 |
Max clock | 2300 MHz | 2200 MHz |
CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
Architecture | - 6 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 465 Silver (Cortex-A55) - 2 cores at 2.3 GHz: Kryo 465 Gold (Cortex-A76) |
- 6 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 460 Silver - 2 cores at 2 GHz: Kryo 460 Gold |
L3 cache | 1 MB | - |
Lithography process | 8 nanometers | 8 nanometers |
Graphics | Adreno 618 | Adreno 619 |
GPU clock | 750 MHz | 825 MHz |
FLOPS | ~435 GFLOPS | ~468 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
AnTuTu Benchmark 9
CPU | 106114 | 96013 |
GPU | 85526 | 84253 |
Memory | 55594 | 62060 |
UX | 90668 | 81099 |
Total score | 339049 | 324721 |
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Max surface temperature | 40.1 °C | 47.5 °C |
Stability | 99% | 99% |
Graphics test | 6 FPS | 5 FPS |
Graphics score | 1040 | 981 |
PCMark 3.0
Web score | 7219 | 5814 |
Video editing | 6258 | 3962 |
Photo editing | 17328 | 13998 |
Data manipulation | 7512 | 6691 |
Writing score | 8998 | 8303 |
Memory
RAM size | 4, 6, 8 GB | 6, 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 1833 MHz |
Channels | 2 | 2 |
Storage size | 128, 256 GB | 128 GB |
Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Memory card max size | Up to 1024 GB | Up to 512 GB |
Software
Operating system | Android 11 (Can be upgraded to Android 13) | Android 11 (Can be upgraded to Android 13) |
ROM | One UI 5.0 | - |
OS size | 25.8 GB | 18 GB |
Battery
Capacity | 4500 mAh | 4470 mAh |
Charge power | 25 W | 18 W |
Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
Replaceable | No | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Reverse charging | No | No |
Fast charging | Yes (35% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 50 min) |
Full charging time | 1:30 hr | 1:50 hr |
Web browsing | 11:08 hr | - |
Watching video | 12:14 hr | - |
Gaming | 05:40 hr | - |
Standby | 117 hr | - |
General battery life
Camera
Matrix | 64 megapixels | 64 megapixels |
Image resolution | 9000 x 7000 | 9000 x 7000 |
Zoom | Digital | Digital |
Flash | LED | LED |
Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
8K video recording | No | No |
4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | 120 FPS (720p) |
Angle of widest lens | 123° | - |
Lenses | 4 (64 MP + 12 MP + 5 MP + 5 MP) | 4 (64 MP + 5 MP + 2 MP + 2 MP) |
Wide (main) lens | - 64 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: 0.8 micron - Sensor: 1/1.7", Sony IMX682 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Phase autofocus - Optical stabilization |
- 64 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Pixel size: 0.8 micron - Phase autofocus |
Ultra-wide lens | - 12 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Focal length: 13 mm - Pixel size: 1.12 micron |
- 5 MP - Phase autofocus |
Macro lens | - 5 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 |
- 2 MP |
Depth lens | - 5 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Pixel size: 1.12 micron - Sensor: 1/5.0" (CMOS) |
- 2 MP |
Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 6528 x 4896 |
Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
Focal length | 26 mm | - |
Pixel size | 0.8 microns | - |
Sensor type | Exmor-RS CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.8" | - |
Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
Connectivity
Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) |
Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
Bluetooth features | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP | LE, A2DP |
USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
USB version | 2 | 2 |
USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode |
GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
NFC* | Yes | Yes |
Infrared port | No | No |
Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
eSIM support* | No | No |
Hybrid slot | Yes | Yes |
LTE Cat* | 15 | 15 |
5G support | No | Yes |
Sound
Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes |
FM radio | Yes | Yes |
Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
Announced | March 2021 | April 2021 |
Release date | March 2021 | May 2021 |
SAR (head) | 0.35 W/kg | 0.51 W/kg |
SAR (body) | 0.84 W/kg | 1.29 W/kg |
Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Samsung Galaxy A52 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 129