ZTE Blade V10 vs Vivo Y95
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.3-inch ZTE Blade V10 (with MediaTek Helio P70) that was released on February 25, 2019, against the Vivo Y95, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 and came out 4 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.
Key differences
Reasons to consider the ZTE Blade V10
- 73% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (185K versus 107K)
- 49% higher pixel density (403 vs 270 PPI)
- Modern USB Type-C port
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 5 wireless networks
- More recent OS version: Android 9 versus 8.1
- 69% faster in single-core GeekBench 5 test: 304 and 180 points
- The front-facing camera can record video at 1080p
Reasons to consider the Vivo Y95
- Comes with 830 mAh larger battery capacity: 4030 vs 3200 mAh
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Performance
CPU/GPU performance in apps and games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview score
Final comparison evaluation
Value for money
You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money.
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.3 inches | 6.22 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2280 pixels | 720 x 1520 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 18.9:9 | 18.9:9 |
| PPI | 403 ppi | 270 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.5% | 83.18% |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | - |
| PWM | Not detected | - |
| Response time | 32 ms | - |
| Contrast | 1538:1 | - |
Max. Brightness
Design and build
| Height | 158 mm (6.22 inches) | 155.1 mm (6.11 inches) |
| Width | 75.8 mm (2.98 inches) | 75 mm (2.95 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm (0.31 inches) | 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 156 gramm (5.5 oz) | 163.5 gramm (5.77 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Plastic |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green | Black, Red |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, rear | Yes, rear |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio P70 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 |
| Max. clock | 2100 MHz | 1950 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A53 - 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A73 |
- 4 cores at 1.45 GHz: Cortex-A53 - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A53 |
| Lithography process | 12 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| Graphics | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 505 |
| GPU clock | 900 MHz | 450 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~255 GFLOPS | ~48 GFLOPS |
| RAM size | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 |
| Memory clock | 933 MHz | 933 MHz |
| Channels | 1 | 1 |
| Storage size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max. size | Up to 256 GB | Up to 256 GB |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
AnTuTu Benchmark 8
Software
| Operating system | Android 9.0 | Android 8.1 |
| ROM | MiFavor 9.0 | Funtouch 4.5 |
Battery
| Capacity | 3200 mAh | 4030 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | No | No |
| Full charging time | 2:05 hr | 2:35 hr |
Camera
| Matrix | 16 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 4128 x 3096 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | 120 FPS (720p) | 120 FPS (720p) |
| Lenses | 2 (16 MP + 5 MP) | 2 (13 MP + 2 MP) |
| Wide (main) lens | - 16 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Pixel size: 1.12 micron - Phase autofocus |
- 13 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Phase autofocus |
| Depth lens | - 5 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 |
- 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode |
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6560 x 4928 | 5120 x 3840 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 microns | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) при 30 FPS | 720p при 30 FPS |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
- Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Bluetooth features | PBAP/PAB, PAN, MAP, LE, HSP, HID, HFP, AVRCP, A2DP | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | Micro USB |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | Yes | No |
| LTE Cat* | 7 | 4 |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Mono |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Speakers test
Max. loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | February 2019 | November 2018 |
| Release date | May 2019 | December 2018 |
| Launch price | ~ 212 USD | ~ 250 USD |
| SAR (head) | 0.127 W/kg | 1.09 W/kg |
| SAR (body) | 0.847 W/kg | 0.32 W/kg |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the ZTE Blade V10 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1