A16 Bionic vs A12 Bionic

We compared two 6-core processors: Apple A16 Bionic (with Apple A16 GPU graphics) and A12 Bionic (Apple A12 GPU). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Apple A16 Bionic
  • Performs 3.1x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 2.3x) AnTuTu 10 score – 1451K vs 643K
  • Announced 4-years and 1-month later
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 7 nm)
  • Supports 50% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 34.1 GB/s)
  • 39% higher CPU clock speed (3460 vs 2490 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~24%)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Promotion

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 10

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
A16 Bionic +126%
1451915
643688
CPU 365046 180501
GPU 460373 203202
Memory 217105 123963
UX 397949 132209
Total score 1451915 643688

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A16 Bionic +103%
2631
1299
Multi-Core Score
A16 Bionic +141%
6863
2844
Asset compression 236.7 MB/sec 108.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 156.7 pages/sec 61.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 162.1 Mpixels/sec 78.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 155.8 images/sec 21.4 images/sec
HDR 207.5 Mpixels/sec 89.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 26.5 images/sec 10.6 images/sec
Photo processing 77.6 images/sec 36.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 6.85 Mpixels/sec 3.35 Mpixels/sec
Promotion

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
A16 Bionic +89%
9851
5207
Stability 82% 69%
Graphics test 58 FPS 31 FPS
Score 9851 5207

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of A16 Bionic and A12 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 2x 3.46 GHz – Everest
4x 2.02 GHz – Sawtooth
2x 2.49 GHz – Vortex
4x 1.6 GHz – Tempest
Cores 6 6
Frequency 3460 MHz 2490 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.3-A
L1 cache 256 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 16 MB 8 MB
Process 4 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count 16 billion 6.9 billion
TDP 8 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Apple A16 GPU Apple A12 GPU
Architecture Apple GPU Apple GPU
GPU frequency 1398 MHz 1125 MHz
Execution units 5 4
Shading units 128 64
Total shaders 640 256
FLOPS 1789.4 Gigaflops 576 Gigaflops

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 34.1 Gbit/s
Max size 6 GB 4 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Neural Engine Neural Engine
Storage type NVMe NVMe
Max display resolution 2796 x 1290 2688 x 1242
Max camera resolution 1x 48MP 1x 32MP, 2x 12MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG H.264, H.265, Motion JPEG
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+ AAC, AAC‑LC, Apple Lossless, HE‑AAC, Linear PCM, AAX и AAX+, HE‑AAC v2, MP3

Connectivity

Modem - Intel XMM 7560
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 7500 Mbps Up to 1000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3500 Mbps Up to 350 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.3 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced September 2022 September 2018
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number APL1W10 APL1W81

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
114 (70.4%)
48 (29.6%)
Total votes: 162

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A12 Bionic and A16 Bionic, or ask any questions
Promotion