Kirin 810 vs Kirin 710F

We compared two 8-core processors: HiSilicon Kirin 810 (with Mali-G52 MP6 graphics) and Kirin 710F (Mali-G51 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 810
  • Performs 2.4x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 77%) AnTuTu 9 score – 369K vs 208K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 12 nm)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 710F
  • Higher GPU frequency (~22%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Kirin 810 +77%
369125
208525
CPU 109064 71135
GPU 95721 33514
Memory 72097 42276
UX 91820 60257
Total score 369125 208525

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Kirin 810 +83%
599
Multi-Core Score
Kirin 810 +43%
1933
1350
Image compression - 83.85 Mpixels/s
Face detection - 11.6 images/s
Speech recognition - 24.15 words/s
Machine learning - 17 images/s
Camera shooting - 9.81 images/s
HTML 5 - 1.74 Mnodes/s
SQLite - 454.55 Krows/s

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 30 FPS
[High]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 41 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Fortnite 29 FPS
[Medium]
-
Shadowgun Legends 43 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 59 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Huawei Honor 9X
1080 x 2340
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Kirin 810 and Kirin 710F

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.27 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2270 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A
L1 cache 256 KB 256 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 512 KB
Process 7 nanometers 12 nanometers
Transistor count 6.9 billion 5.5 billion
TDP 5 W 5 W

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G52 MP6 Mali-G51 MP4
Architecture Rogue Bifrost
GPU frequency 820 MHz 1000 MHz
Execution units 6 4
Shading units 96 64
FLOPS 551 Gigaflops 225 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.0
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit
Max bandwidth 31.78 Gbit/s -
Max size 8 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Yes No
Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2340 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP
Video capture 1K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 12
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 4
Bluetooth 5.0 4.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced June 2019 January 2019
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number Hi6280 -
Official page HiSilicon Kirin 810 official site -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
179 (77.5%)
52 (22.5%)
Total votes: 231

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 710F and Kirin 810, or ask any questions