Dimensity 1000 Plus vs Dimensity 1000

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus (with Mali-G77 MC9 graphics) and Dimensity 1000 (Mali-G77 MP9). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
  • Shows better (up to 31%) AnTuTu 9 score – 577K vs 441K
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
577507
CPU 154856 141266
GPU 212559 146104
Memory 89293 84463
UX 116031 69537
Total score 577507 441716

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Image compression 176.7 Mpixels/s -
Face detection 28.2 images/s -
Speech recognition 45.6 words/s -
Machine learning 46.9 images/s -
Camera shooting 28.9 images/s -
HTML 5 3.53 Mnodes/s -
SQLite 857.5 Krows/s -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 45 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 55 FPS
[High]
-
Fortnite 28 FPS
[Medium]
-
Shadowgun Legends 58 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 56 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 59 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device iQOO Z1
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 1000 Plus and Dimensity 1000

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A77
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A77
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2600 MHz 2600 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.3-A ARMv8.2-A
L3 cache 0.512 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers
TDP 10 W 10 W

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G77 MC9 Mali-G77 MP9
Architecture Valhall Valhall
GPU frequency 850 MHz 850 MHz
Execution units 9 9
Shading units 144 144
FLOPS - 800 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1866 MHz 1866 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 29.87 Gbit/s 29.87 Gbit/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 80MP, 2x 32MP 1x 80MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 1200 Mbps Up to 1200 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 316 Mbps Up to 211 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.1 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced May 2020 November 2019
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number MT6889Z/CZA MT6889
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus official site MediaTek Dimensity 1000 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
165 (60.9%)
106 (39.1%)
Total votes: 271

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 1000 and Dimensity 1000 Plus, or ask any questions
Avatar
Yusuf 13 February 2021 15:34
You miss one most important information about both chipset, it's price. May be Dimensity 1000 plus is more costly than Dimensity 1000 according to specifications. So please mention the price also.
+4 Reply
Avatar
SupSab 18 January 2021 12:29
lol , when older version is better than latest !
+7 Reply
Avatar
Im gay 10 November 2020 01:59
Why is the normal dimensity 1000 better than the plus, it's everything is the same
+28 Reply
Avatar
Indian 🇮🇳 17 January 2021 05:14
Optimization or network speed
+3 Reply