Dimensity 8100 vs Kirin 9000

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (with Mali-G610 MC6 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 9000 (Mali-G78 MP24). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  • Announced 1-year and 5-months later
  • Supports 16% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 44 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 6%) AnTuTu 9 score – 808K vs 761K
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 9000
  • 10% higher CPU clock speed (3130 vs 2850 MHz)
We may receive a commission from Amazon for purchases made using the links below.

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
808326
761621
CPU 196804 194527
GPU 313342 280796
Memory 140254 146761
UX 161901 140303
Total score 808326 761621

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Kirin 9000 +10%
1045
Multi-Core Score
3791
3712

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
6058
Stability 98% 52%
Graphics test 34 FPS 36 FPS
Score 5770 6058

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 77 FPS
[Ultra]
81 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Ultra]
44 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite 26 FPS
[High]
29 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 74 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 98 FPS
[Ultra]
51 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 57 FPS
[Ultra]
58 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 59 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device OnePlus Ace
1080 x 2412
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
1344 x 3140
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 8100 and Kirin 9000

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77
3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77
4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2850 MHz 3130 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 5 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count - 15.3 billion
TDP 8 W 6 W

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G610 MC6 Mali-G78 MP24
Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall 2
GPU frequency 860 MHz -
Execution units 6 24
Shading units - 384
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2750 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 44 Gbit/s
Max size - 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Yes AI accelerator
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP -
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Balong 5000
4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC

Info

Announced March 2022 October 2020
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number MT6895Z/TCZA -
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 8100 official site HiSilicon Kirin 9000 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
259 (74.4%)
89 (25.6%)
Total votes: 348

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 9000 and Dimensity 8100, or ask any questions
Promotion