Helio G35 vs Helio A25

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Helio G35 (with IMG PowerVR GE8320 graphics) and Helio A25 (PowerVR GE8320). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.


General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Helio G35
  • Announced 2-years and 1-month later
  • 28% higher CPU clock speed (2300 vs 1800 MHz)
  • Performs 31% better in floating-point computations
  • Higher GPU frequency (~13%)
  • Better instruction set architecture


Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Helio A25 +2%
CPU 38387 41918
GPU 17494 10587
Memory 18500 18065
UX 38325 44364
Total score 112922 115203

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Helio G35 +27%
Multi-Core Score
Helio A25 +11%
Image compression 27.3 Mpixels/s 56.8 Mpixels/s
Face detection 4.3 images/s 6.01 images/s
Speech recognition 9.73 words/s 13.5 words/s
Machine learning 6.17 images/s 9.48 images/s
Camera shooting 2.88 images/s 4.05 images/s
HTML 5 0.5962999999999999 Mnodes/s 0.8921 Mnodes/s
SQLite 137.2 Krows/s 271.4 Krows/s


Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 23 FPS
Call of Duty: Mobile 29 FPS
Shadowgun Legends 30 FPS
World of Tanks Blitz 43 FPS
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 29 FPS
Device Xiaomi Poco C3
720 x 1600
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.


Full list of technical specifications of Helio G35 and Helio A25


Architecture 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2300 MHz 1800 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A
Process 12 nanometers 12 nanometers
TDP 5 W 5 W


GPU name IMG PowerVR GE8320 PowerVR GE8320
Architecture Rogue Rogue
GPU frequency 680 MHz 600 MHz
Execution units 2 2
Shading units 32 64
FLOPS 54.4 Gigaflops 41.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 1.2 1.2
DirectX version 12 11


Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1600 MHz 1600 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 14.9 Gbit/s -
Max size 6 GB 4 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) No NeuroPilot
Storage type eMMC 5.1 eMMC 5.1
Max display resolution 2400 x 1080 1600 x 720
Max camera resolution 1x 25MP, 2x 16MP 1x 16MP
Video capture 1K at 30FPS 1K at 30FPS
Video playback 1080p at 30FPS 1080p at 30FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1 H.264, H.265
Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV


4G support LTE Cat. 7 LTE Cat. 4
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 300 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 50 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou


Announced June 2020 June 2018
Class Low end Low end
Model number MT6765G MT6762V/WD
Official page MediaTek Helio G35 official site MediaTek Helio A25 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
94 (59.1%)
65 (40.9%)
Total votes: 159


Please give your opinion on the comparison of Helio A25 and Helio G35, or ask any questions