Helio G95 vs Kirin 710

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Helio G95 (with Mali-G76 3EEMC4 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 710 (Mali-G51 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Helio G95
  • Shows significantly better (up to 64%) AnTuTu 9 score – 332K vs 202K
  • Announced 2-years and 2-months later
  • Higher GPU frequency (~38%)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 710
  • 7% higher CPU clock speed (2200 vs 2050 MHz)
  • Performs 15% better in floating-point computations

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Helio G95 +64%
332134
202013
CPU 95615 70160
GPU 85900 32918
Memory 54379 40008
UX 98554 59919
Total score 332134 202013

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Helio G95 +56%
513
328
Multi-Core Score
Helio G95 +27%
1602
1266
Image compression 98 Mpixels/s 83.95 Mpixels/s
Face detection 14.4 images/s 11.7 images/s
Speech recognition 30.5 words/s 24 words/s
Machine learning 26.4 images/s 17.1 images/s
Camera shooting 13.7 images/s 9.81 images/s
HTML 5 1.93 Mnodes/s 1.74 Mnodes/s
SQLite 500.3 Krows/s 454.55 Krows/s

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 51 FPS
[Low]
51 FPS
[Medium]
Call of Duty: Mobile 38 FPS
[Ultra]
29 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite 27 FPS
[Low]
25 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 57 FPS
[Low]
56 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 48 FPS
[High]
52 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 27 FPS
[Low]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 52 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Realme 7
1080 x 2400
Huawei Honor 10 Lite
1080 x 2340
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Helio G95 and Kirin 710

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2050 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A
L1 cache - 256 KB
L2 cache - 512 KB
L3 cache - 1 MB
Process 12 nanometers 12 nanometers
Transistor count - 5.5 billion
TDP 5 W 5 W

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G76 3EEMC4 Mali-G51 MP4
Architecture Bifrost Bifrost
GPU frequency 900 MHz 650 MHz
Execution units 4 4
Shading units 64 64
FLOPS 195.8 Gigaflops 225 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.0
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz
Bus 2x 32 Bit 2x 32 Bit
Max size 10 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Da Vinci No
Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2340 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 12
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 4
Bluetooth 5.0 4.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced September 2020 July 2018
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6785V/CD Hi6260
Official page MediaTek Helio G95 official site HiSilicon Kirin 710 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
65 (73%)
24 (27%)
Total votes: 89

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 710 and Helio G95, or ask any questions