Helio P65 vs Helio G95
We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Helio P65 (with Mali-G52 MC2 graphics) and Helio G95 (Mali-G76 3EEMC4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of MediaTek Helio G95
- Performs 3.5x better in floating-point computations
- Shows significantly better (up to 79%) AnTuTu 9 score – 354K vs 198K
- Supports 28% higher memory bandwidth (17.1 against 13.41 GB/s)
- Announced 1-year and 3-months later
- Higher GPU frequency (~10%)
- Better instruction set architecture
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 9
| CPU | 64862 | 91164 |
| GPU | 32798 | 92467 |
| Memory | 40479 | 66848 |
| UX | 58333 | 101279 |
| Total score | 198174 | 354231 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | 78.8 Mpixels/s | 96.2 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | 11.5 images/s | 14.6 images/s |
| Speech recognition | 24.7 words/s | 31.1 words/s |
| Machine learning | 18.5 images/s | 26.4 images/s |
| Camera shooting | 9.18 images/s | 13.8 images/s |
| HTML 5 | 1.5 Mnodes/s | 1.97 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | 418.5 Krows/s | 444.9 Krows/s |
3DMark
3DMark Wild Life Performance
| Stability | 97% | 98% |
| Graphics test | 3 FPS | 8 FPS |
| Score | 572 | 1480 |
Gaming
| PUBG Mobile | - | 51 FPS [Low] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | - | 38 FPS [Ultra] |
| Fortnite | - | 27 FPS [Low] |
| Shadowgun Legends | - | 57 FPS [Low] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | - | 48 FPS [High] |
| Genshin Impact | - | 27 FPS [Low] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | - | 52 FPS [Ultra] |
| Device | - | Realme 7 1080 x 2400 |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Helio P65 and Helio G95CPU
| Architecture | 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2050 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process | 12 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 5.5 billion | - |
| TDP | - | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G76 3EEMC4 |
| Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost 3 |
| GPU frequency | 820 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Execution units | 2 | 4 |
| Shading units | 32 | 64 |
| FLOPS | 56.4 Gigaflops | 195.8 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 13.41 Gbit/s | 17.1 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 8 GB | 10 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Da Vinci |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
| Video capture | 2K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 2K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 12 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 300 Mbps | Up to 600 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 100 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
| Announced | June 2019 | September 2020 |
| Class | Mid range | Mid range |
| Model number | MT6768 | MT6785V/CD |
| Official page | MediaTek Helio P65 official site | MediaTek Helio G95 official site |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 223