Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 435 vs Kirin 650 – what's better?

Snapdragon 435 vs Kirin 650

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (with Adreno 505 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 650 (Mali-T830 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs and comprehensive tests in benchmarks like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
  • Developers optimize games for Snapdragon processors more often than for Kirin
  • Performs 20% better in floating-point computations
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 650
  • Higher GPU frequency (~2x)
  • Has the smaller size of the transistor (16 versus 28 nm)
  • 43% higher CPU clock speed (2000 vs 1400 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
AnTuTu Benchmark 7
Kirin 650 +17%
59852
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Kirin 650 +32%
168
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Kirin 650 +39%
808

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 435 and Kirin 650

CPU

Architecture 8x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
Cores 8 8
Frequency 1400 MHz 2000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8-A
Process 28 nanometers 16 nanometers
Transistor count 1 billion 4 billion

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 505 Mali-T830 MP2
Architecture Adreno 500 Midgard
GPU frequency 450 MHz 900 MHz
Cores - 2
Number of ALUs 96 -
FLOPS 48 Gigaflops 40 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.0 1.0
OpenCL version 2.0 1.2
DirectX version 11 11

Memory

Memory type LPDDR3 LPDDR3
Memory frequency 800 MHz 933 MHz
Bus 1x 32 Bit 2x 32 Bit
Max bandwidth 6.4 Gbit/s -
Max size 4 GB 4 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 536 No
Storage type eMMC 5.1 eMMC 5.1
Max display resolution 1920 x 1200 1920 x 1200
Max camera resolution 1x 21MP 1x 21MP
Video capture 1K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8 H.264, H.265
Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem X9 -
4G support LTE Cat. 7 LTE Cat. 6
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 300 Mbps Up to 300 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 50 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 4
Bluetooth 4.1 4.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS

Info

Announced February 2016 January 2016
Class Low end Mid range
Model number MSM8940 -
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 official site -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

Comments

Here you can give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 650 and Snapdragon 435 or ask any questions