Snapdragon 632 vs Kirin 710
We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (with Adreno 506 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 710 (Mali-G51 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
- Developers optimize games for Snapdragon processors more often than for Kirin
- Higher GPU frequency (~12%)
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 710
- Performs 80% better in floating-point computations
- Shows better (up to 32%) AnTuTu 9 score – 196K vs 148K
- 22% higher CPU clock speed (2200 vs 1800 MHz)
- Has a smaller size transistor (12 versus 14 nm)
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 9
| CPU | 55630 | 70901 |
| GPU | 16312 | 33222 |
| Memory | 23558 | 33714 |
| UX | 52895 | 57642 |
| Total score | 148664 | 196399 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | 81 Mpixels/s | 83.95 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | 11.3 images/s | 11.7 images/s |
| Speech recognition | 18.95 words/s | 24 words/s |
| Machine learning | 13.05 images/s | 17.1 images/s |
| Camera shooting | 8.73 images/s | 9.81 images/s |
| HTML 5 | 1.05 Mnodes/s | 1.74 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | 426.3 Krows/s | 454.55 Krows/s |
3DMark
3DMark Wild Life Performance
| Stability | - | 84% |
| Graphics test | 1 FPS | 3 FPS |
| Score | 168 | 554 |
Gaming
| PUBG Mobile | - | 51 FPS [Medium] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | - | 29 FPS [Low] |
| Fortnite | - | 25 FPS [Low] |
| Shadowgun Legends | - | 56 FPS [Low] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | - | 52 FPS [Ultra] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | - | 60 FPS [Ultra] |
| Device | - | Huawei Honor 10 Lite 1080 x 2340 |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 632 and Kirin 710CPU
| Architecture | 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 250 Gold (Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 250 Silver (Cortex-A53) |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
| L1 cache | - | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | - | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | - | 1 MB |
| Process | 14 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 2 billion | 5.5 billion |
| TDP | 7 W | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU name | Adreno 506 | Mali-G51 MP4 |
| Architecture | Adreno 500 | Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 725 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 1 | 4 |
| Shading units | 96 | 64 |
| FLOPS | 124.8 Gigaflops | 225 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4 |
| Memory frequency | 933 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 32 Bit |
| Max size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 546 | No |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| Max display resolution | 1920 x 1200 | 2340 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 40MP, 2x 13MP | 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X9 LTE | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 12 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 300 Mbps | Up to 600 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 4.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
| Announced | June 2018 | July 2018 |
| Class | Mid range | Mid range |
| Model number | SDM632 | Hi6260 |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 official site | HiSilicon Kirin 710 official site |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 138