Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 660 vs Kirin 650 – what's better?

Snapdragon 660 vs Kirin 650

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (with Adreno 512 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 650 (Mali-T830 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
  • Performs 5.4x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 2.4x) AnTuTu 8 score – 152K vs 63K
  • Developers optimize games for Snapdragon processors more often than for Kirin
  • Announced 1-year and 4-months later
  • 10% higher CPU clock speed (2200 vs 2000 MHz)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (14 versus 16 nm)
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 650
  • Higher GPU frequency (~6%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 8

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
152734
63404
CPU 69937 -
GPU 24360 -
Memory 32441 -
UX 27977 -
Total score 152734 63404

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
330
165
Multi-Core Score
1295
786
Image compression 88.7 Mpixels/s 62.4 Mpixels/s
Face detection 12 images/s 8.63 images/s
Speech recognition 24.1 words/s 14.6 words/s
Machine learning 18.3 images/s 9.69 images/s
Camera shooting 11 images/s 4.31 images/s
HTML 5 1.76 Mnodes/s 1.11 Mnodes/s
SQLite 487.4 Krows/s 289.9 Krows/s

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 660 and Kirin 650

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)
4x 1.84 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53)
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8-A
L2 cache 2 MB -
Process 14 nanometers 16 nanometers
Transistor count 1.75 billion 4 billion
TDP 9 W 5 W

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 512 Mali-T830 MP2
Architecture Adreno 500 Midgard
GPU frequency 850 MHz 900 MHz
Execution units 1 2
Shading units 128 32
FLOPS 217 Gigaflops 40 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.0 1.0
OpenCL version 2.0 1.2
DirectX version 12 11

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR3
Memory frequency 1866 MHz 933 MHz
Bus 2x 32 Bit 2x 32 Bit
Max bandwidth 29.8 Gbit/s -
Max size 8 GB 4 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 680 No
Storage type UFS 2.1 eMMC 5.1
Max display resolution 2560 x 1600 1920 x 1200
Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP 1x 21MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265
Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem X12 -
4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 6
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 300 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 50 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 4
Bluetooth 5.0 4.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS

Info

Announced May 2017 January 2016
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SDM660 -
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 official site -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
5 (45.5%)
6 (54.5%)
Total votes: 11

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 650 and Snapdragon 660, or ask any questions