Snapdragon 695 vs Snapdragon 660

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and Snapdragon 660 (Adreno 512). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 14 nm)
  • Announced 4-years and 6-months later
  • Performs 2.2x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 93%) AnTuTu 10 score – 439K vs 227K
  • Supports 22% higher memory bandwidth (17 against 13.9 GB/s)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~12%)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Promotion

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 10

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
439495
CPU 153615 66281
GPU 81726 46008
Memory 97539 55092
UX 106511 58050
Total score 439495 227414

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 106.3 MB/sec 71.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 58.3 pages/sec 41.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 79.4 Mpixels/sec 51.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 43.4 images/sec 13.6 images/sec
HDR 68.1 Mpixels/sec 46.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 6.37 images/sec 1.89 images/sec
Photo processing 20.9 images/sec 10.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.86 Mpixels/sec 1.97 Mpixels/sec
Compute Score (GPU)
Promotion

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Stability 99% 96%
Graphics test 7 FPS 2 FPS
Score 1201 373

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]
-
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]
-
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Snapdragon 660

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
4x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)
4x 1.84 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A
L2 cache - 2 MB
Process 6 nanometers 14 nanometers
Transistor count - 1.75 billion
TDP 4 W 5 W
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Adreno 512
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 500
GPU frequency 950 MHz 850 MHz
Execution units 2 1
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 128
FLOPS 486.4 Gigaflops 217.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.0
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 11

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gbit/s 13.9 Gbit/s
Max size 8 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Hexagon 680
Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2560 x 1600
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 X12
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 13
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 May 2017
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6375 SM6115
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
166 (82.6%)
35 (17.4%)
Total votes: 201

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 660 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
Promotion