Snapdragon 855 vs Helio P65
We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (with Adreno 640 graphics) and MediaTek Helio P65 (Arm Mali-G52 2EEMC2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
- Performs 15.9x better in floating-point computations
- Supports 154% higher memory bandwidth (34.1 against 13.41 GB/s)
- Shows significantly better (up to 2.3x) AnTuTu 8 score – 436K vs 186K
- Developers optimize games for Snapdragon processors more often than for Helio
- Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 12 nm)
- 42% higher CPU clock speed (2840 vs 2000 MHz)
Pros of MediaTek Helio P65
- Higher GPU frequency (~40%)
- Announced 7-months later
- Better instruction set architecture
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 8
CPU | 142660 | 64553 |
GPU | 172185 | 29759 |
Memory | 56295 | 31973 |
UX | 53180 | 34654 |
Total score | 436231 | 186732 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Image compression | 143.55 Mpixels/s | - |
Face detection | 23.7 images/s | - |
Speech recognition | 44.8 words/s | - |
Machine learning | 45.65 images/s | - |
Camera shooting | 24.2 images/s | - |
HTML 5 | 2.93 Mnodes/s | - |
SQLite | 783.05 Krows/s | - |
Gaming
PUBG Mobile | 58 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
Call of Duty: Mobile | 56 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
Fortnite | 28 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
Shadowgun Legends | 51 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
World of Tanks Blitz | 59 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 57 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
Device | Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro 1080 x 2340 |
- |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 855 and Helio P65CPU
Architecture | 1x 2.84 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold) 3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold) 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver) |
2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Cores | 8 | 8 |
Frequency | 2840 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Instruction set | ARMv8.1-A | ARMv8.2-A |
L1 cache | 384 KB | - |
L2 cache | 768 KB | - |
L3 cache | 2 MB | - |
Process | 7 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
Transistor count | 6.7 billion | 5.5 billion |
TDP | 10 W | - |
Graphics
GPU name | Adreno 640 | Arm Mali-G52 2EEMC2 |
Architecture | Adreno 600 | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 585 MHz | 820 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 2 |
Shading units | 384 | 32 |
FLOPS | 899 Gigaflops | 56.4 Gigaflops |
Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.0 |
OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
Max bandwidth | 34.1 Gbit/s | 13.41 Gbit/s |
Max size | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 690 | NeuroPilot |
Storage type | UFS 3.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2520 x 1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP |
Video capture | 4K at 120FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
Video playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 1080p at 30FPS |
Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
Modem | X24 LTE, X50 5G | - |
4G support | LTE Cat. 20 | LTE Cat. 7 |
5G support | Yes | No |
Download speed | Up to 2000 Mbps | Up to 300 Mbps |
Upload speed | Up to 316 Mbps | Up to 100 Mbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 | 5 |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
Announced | December 2018 | June 2019 |
Class | Flagship | Mid range |
Model number | SM8150 | - |
Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 official site | MediaTek Helio P65 official site |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 28