Snapdragon 865 vs Snapdragon 765
We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (with Adreno 650 graphics) and Snapdragon 765 (Adreno 620). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
- Performs 2x better in floating-point computations
- Supports 101% higher memory bandwidth (34.1 against 17 GB/s)
- Shows significantly better (up to 88%) AnTuTu 9 score – 650K vs 346K
- 23% higher CPU clock speed (2840 vs 2300 MHz)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
- Higher GPU frequency (~28%)
- Better instruction set architecture
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 9
| CPU | 185574 | 96639 |
| GPU | 217010 | 104891 |
| Memory | 112445 | 66725 |
| UX | 137783 | 79879 |
| Total score | 650686 | 346850 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | 164.1 Mpixels/s | - |
| Face detection | 26.1 images/s | - |
| Speech recognition | 49.6 words/s | - |
| Machine learning | 50 images/s | - |
| Camera shooting | 29.5 images/s | - |
| HTML 5 | 3.25 Mnodes/s | - |
| SQLite | 880 Krows/s | - |
Gaming
| PUBG Mobile | 60 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 61 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
| Fortnite | 30 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 60 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
| Genshin Impact | 60 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 59 FPS [Ultra] |
- |
| Device | Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 1080 x 2340 |
- |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 865 and Snapdragon 765CPU
| Architecture | 1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77) 3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77) 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
1x 2.3 GHz – Kryo 475 Prime (Cortex-A76) 1x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 475 Gold (Cortex-A76) 6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2840 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.3-A |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | - |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | - |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | - |
| Process | 7 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 10.3 billion | - |
| TDP | 10 W | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU name | Adreno 650 | Adreno 620 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 587 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Execution units | 2 | 3 |
| Shading units | 512 | 192 |
| FLOPS | 1228 Gigaflops | 600 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 Gbit/s | 17 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 16 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 698 | Hexagon 696 |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.0 |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3200 x 1800 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP | 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X55 | X52 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 2000 Mbps | Up to 1200 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 316 Mbps | Up to 210 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | December 2019 | December 2019 |
| Class | Flagship | Mid range |
| Model number | SM8250-AB | SM7250-AA |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 official site | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 official site |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 95
