Snapdragon 865 vs Snapdragon 765G
We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (with Adreno 650 graphics) and Snapdragon 765G (Adreno 620). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs and comprehensive tests in benchmarks like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
- Supports 159% higher memory bandwidth (44 against 17 GB/s)
- Performs 71% better in floating-point computations
- Shows significantly better (up to 75%) AnTuTu 8 score – 552K vs 316K
- 18% higher CPU clock speed (2840 vs 2400 MHz)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
- Higher GPU frequency (~28%)
- Better instruction set architecture
Benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
AnTuTu Benchmark 8
Specifications
CPU
| Architecture | 1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77) 3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77) 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 475 Prime (Cortex-A76) 1x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 475 Gold (Cortex-A76) 6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2840 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.3-A |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | - |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | - |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | - |
| Process | 7 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
Graphics
| GPU name | Adreno 650 | Adreno 620 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 587 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Number of ALUs | 384 | 192 |
| FLOPS | 1228 Gigaflops | 720 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 44 Gbit/s | 17 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 16 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 698 | Hexagon 696 |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.0 |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3200 x 1800 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP | 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X55 | X52 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 2500 Mbps | Up to 1200 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 316 Mbps | Up to 210 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS |
Info
| Announced | December 2019 | December 2019 |
| Class | Flagship | Mid range |
| Model number | SM8250 | SM7250-AB |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 official site | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G official site |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 218
Related Comparisons
- HiSilicon Kirin 980 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
- Apple A13 Bionic or Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 or Snapdragon 865
- Samsung Exynos 990 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 or Snapdragon 765G
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 or Snapdragon 765G
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G or Snapdragon 765G
- HiSilicon Kirin 810 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 or Snapdragon 765G