Exynos 1330 vs Snapdragon 870
We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1330 (with Mali G68 MP2 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 (Adreno 650). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1330
- Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 7 nm)
- Higher GPU frequency (~42%)
- Announced 2-years and 2-months later
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
- Performs 5.7x better in floating-point computations
- Shows significantly better (up to 92%) AnTuTu 9 score – 709K vs 368K
- 33% higher CPU clock speed (3200 vs 2400 MHz)
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 9
| CPU | 129193 | 194224 |
| GPU | 60021 | 244668 |
| Memory | 75128 | 120826 |
| UX | 101477 | 147329 |
| Total score | 368466 | 709119 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | - | 180.7 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | - | 25 images/s |
| Speech recognition | - | 55.6 words/s |
| Machine learning | - | 56.8 images/s |
| Camera shooting | - | 27 images/s |
| HTML 5 | - | 3.11 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | - | 987.3 Krows/s |
3DMark
3DMark Wild Life Performance
| Stability | 99% | 90% |
| Graphics test | 8 FPS | 25 FPS |
| Score | 1384 | 4304 |
Gaming
| PUBG Mobile | - | 88 FPS [Ultra] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | - | 59 FPS [Ultra] |
| Fortnite | - | 27 FPS [Ultra] |
| Shadowgun Legends | - | 102 FPS [Ultra] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | - | 107 FPS [Ultra] |
| Genshin Impact | - | 49 FPS [Ultra] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | - | 60 FPS [Ultra] |
| Device | - | Xiaomi Black Shark 4 1080 x 2400 |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1330 and Snapdragon 870CPU
| Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 3.2 GHz – Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77) 3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77) 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2400 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | - | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | - | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | - | 4 MB |
| Process | 5 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Transistor count | - | 10.3 billion |
| TDP | 7 W | 6 W |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali G68 MP2 | Adreno 650 |
| Architecture | Valhal 2 | Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 670 MHz |
| Execution units | 2 | 2 |
| Shading units | 24 | 512 |
| FLOPS | 240 Gigaflops | 1372 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | - | 44 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Hexagon 698 |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2960 x 1440 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8 | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | - | X55 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 22 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 2550 Mbps | Up to 7500 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 1280 Mbps | Up to 3000 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | February 2023 | January 2021 |
| Class | Mid range | Flagship |
| Model number | S5E8535 | SM8250-AC |
| Official page | Samsung Exynos 1330 official site | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 official site |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 30