Exynos 2100 vs A13 Bionic

We compared the 8-core Samsung Exynos 2100 (Mali-G78 MP14) with the older 6-core Apple A13 Bionic (Apple A13 Bionic GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2100
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 7 nm)
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Announced 1-year and 3-months later
  • Shows better (up to 17%) AnTuTu 9 score – 734K vs 627K
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (2900 vs 2660 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
734592
627628
CPU 189103 144483
GPU 274155 262635
Memory 137436 96216
UX 131951 119762
Total score 734592 627628
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A13 Bionic +23%
1335
Multi-Core Score
3604
3532
Image compression 170.5 Mpixels/s 151.6 Mpixels/s
Face detection 26.7 images/s 29.65 images/s
Speech recognition 64.15 words/s 87.4 words/s
Machine learning 51.35 images/s 72.5 images/s
Camera shooting 33.9 images/s 33.75 images/s
HTML 5 3.21 Mnodes/s 3.81 Mnodes/s
SQLite 970.15 Krows/s 901.1 Krows/s

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 57 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 60 FPS
[High]
World of Tanks Blitz - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 59 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Apple iPhone 11 Pro
828 x 1792
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2100 and A13 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-X1
3x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.66 GHz – Lightning
4x 1.6 GHz – Thunder
Cores 8 6
Frequency 2900 MHz 2660 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.4-A
L1 cache - 832 KB
L2 cache - 12 MB
Process 5 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count - 8.5 billion
TDP 9 W 6 W

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G78 MP14 Apple A13 Bionic GPU
Architecture Vallhall 2 -
GPU frequency 760 MHz -
Execution units 14 4
Shading units 224 -
FLOPS - 736 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.1
DirectX version 12 12.1

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz -
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s -
Max size 16 GB 4 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes, Neural Engine
Storage type UFS 3.1 NVMe
Max display resolution 4096 x 2160 2688 x 1242
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP -
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, Motion JPEG
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 3000 Mbps Up to 1200 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 422 Mbps Up to 220 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced December 2020 September 2019
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9840 -
Official page Samsung Exynos 2100 official site -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
384 (75.4%)
125 (24.6%)
Total votes: 509

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A13 Bionic and Exynos 2100, or ask any questions
Avatar
Hahaha 30 August 2021 16:36
Apple says:- thats why iphone 11 is gaming beast.
+8 Reply
Avatar
Ha ha ha 08 April 2021 14:16
Apple users got triggered seeing this
+26 Reply