Exynos 2100 vs Google Tensor

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 2100 (with Mali-G78 MP14 graphics) and Google Tensor (Mali-G78 MP20). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2100
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Google Tensor
  • Announced 10-months later
  • Higher GPU frequency (~12%)
We may receive a commission from Amazon for purchases made using the links below.

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
755523
745917
CPU 202484 196221
GPU 285430 297786
Memory 123653 107096
UX 140161 143527
Total score 755523 745917

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1090
Multi-Core Score
3621
Image compression 168.4 Mpixels/s -
Face detection 27.5 images/s -
Speech recognition 65.6 words/s -
Machine learning 50.9 images/s -
Camera shooting 31.1 images/s -
HTML 5 3.39 Mnodes/s -
SQLite 1010 Krows/s -

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
6222
Stability 66% 55%
Graphics test 33 FPS 37 FPS
Score 5677 6222

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2100 and Google Tensor

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-X1
3x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X1
2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex A76
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2900 MHz 2800 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.2-A
L2 cache - 3 MB
L3 cache - 4 MB
Process 5 nanometers 5 nanometers
TDP 9 W 10 W

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G78 MP14 Mali-G78 MP20
Architecture Vallhall 2 Valhall
GPU frequency 760 MHz 848 MHz
Execution units 14 20
Shading units 224 320
FLOPS - 2171 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 51.2 Gbit/s
Max size 16 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Tensor Processing Unit
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP -
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3000 Mbps Up to 1200 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 422 Mbps Up to 200 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced December 2020 October 2021
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9840 S5E9845
Official page Samsung Exynos 2100 official site Google Tensor official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
561 (49.3%)
577 (50.7%)
Total votes: 1138

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Google Tensor and Exynos 2100, or ask any questions