Exynos 2100 vs Dimensity 9000

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 2100 (with Mali-G78 MP14 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (Mali-G710). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9000
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 5 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 33%) AnTuTu 9 score – 1005K vs 757K
  • Supports 17% higher memory bandwidth (60 against 51.2 GB/s)
  • Announced 11-months later
  • 5% higher CPU clock speed (3050 vs 2900 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture
  • Higher GPU frequency (~12%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
757342
1005151
CPU 202484 257778
GPU 285430 400071
Memory 123653 156049
UX 140161 188263
Total score 757342 1005151

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1273
Multi-Core Score
4335
Image compression 168.4 Mpixels/s -
Face detection 27.5 images/s -
Speech recognition 65.6 words/s -
Machine learning 50.9 images/s -
Camera shooting 31.1 images/s -
HTML 5 3.39 Mnodes/s -
SQLite 1010 Krows/s -

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
8054
Stability 66% 88%
Graphics test 33 FPS 48 FPS
Score 5659 8054

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2100 and Dimensity 9000

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-X1
3x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2900 MHz 3050 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv9-A
L1 cache - 1024 KB
L2 cache - 3.5 MB
L3 cache - 8 MB
Process 5 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP 9 W 4 W

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G78 MP14 Mali-G710
Architecture Vallhall 2 Valhall 3
GPU frequency 760 MHz 850 MHz
Execution units 14 10
Shading units 224 512
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3750 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 60 Gbit/s
Max size 16 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3000 Mbps -
Upload speed Up to 422 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced December 2020 November 2021
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9840 MT6983
Official page Samsung Exynos 2100 official site MediaTek Dimensity 9000 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
50 (11.5%)
384 (88.5%)
Total votes: 434

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 9000 and Exynos 2100, or ask any questions