Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Exynos 8895 vs Helio P65 – what's better?

Exynos 8895 vs Helio P65

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 8895 (with Mali-G71 MP20 graphics) and MediaTek Helio P65 (Arm Mali-G52 2EEMC2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 8895
  • Performs 6.2x better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 116% higher memory bandwidth (29 against 13.41 GB/s)
  • 16% higher CPU clock speed (2314 vs 2000 MHz)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (10 versus 12 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~10%)
Pros of MediaTek Helio P65
  • Announced 2-years and 4-months later
  • Better instruction set architecture
  • Shows better (up to 4%) AnTuTu 8 score – 181K vs 174K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 8

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
174292
Helio P65 +4%
181253
CPU 58492 64553
GPU 54965 29759
Memory 29058 31973
UX 32663 34654
Total score 174292 181253

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
374
340
Multi-Core Score
1556
1270
Image compression 99.55 Mpixels/s -
Face detection 14.55 images/s -
Speech recognition 26.3 words/s -
Machine learning 20.35 images/s -
Camera shooting 15.55 images/s -
HTML 5 1.52 Mnodes/s -
SQLite 475.7 Krows/s -

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 8895 and Helio P65

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.314 GHz – Exynos M2
4x 1.69 GHz – Cortex-A53
2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2314 MHz 2000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 64 KB -
L2 cache 2 MB -
Process 10 nanometers 12 nanometers
Transistor count 3 billion 5.5 billion
TDP 5 W -

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G71 MP20 Arm Mali-G52 2EEMC2
Architecture Bifrost Bifrost
GPU frequency 900 MHz 820 MHz
Execution units 20 2
Shading units 320 32
FLOPS 349 Gigaflops 56.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.0 1.0
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 11 12

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4
Memory frequency 1866 MHz 1800 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 29 Gbit/s 13.41 Gbit/s
Max size 4 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) No NeuroPilot
Storage type UFS 2.1 eMMC 5.1
Max display resolution 4096 x 2160 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 28MP, 2x 16MP 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 1K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 120FPS 1080p at 30FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
Audio codecs 192 kHz/24 bit AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 16 LTE Cat. 7
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 1000 Mbps Up to 300 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 100 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced February 2017 June 2019
Class Flagship Mid range
Official page Samsung Exynos 8895 official site MediaTek Helio P65 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
9 (52.9%)
8 (47.1%)
Total votes: 17

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Helio P65 and Exynos 8895, or ask any questions