Exynos 9609 vs Kirin 710F
We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 9609 (with Mali-G72 MP3 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 710F (Mali-G51). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Samsung Exynos 9609
- Has a smaller size transistor (10 versus 12 nm)
- Performs 15% better in floating-point computations
- Shows better (up to 11%) AnTuTu 8 score – 188K vs 170K
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 710F
- Higher GPU frequency (~11%)
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 8
| CPU | 69198 | 72142 |
| GPU | 34563 | 22406 |
| Memory | 47856 | 36361 |
| UX | 33126 | 32219 |
| Total score | 188558 | 170071 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | 77.65 Mpixels/s | 83.85 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | 11.55 images/s | 11.6 images/s |
| Speech recognition | 25.65 words/s | 24.15 words/s |
| Machine learning | 18.2 images/s | 17 images/s |
| Camera shooting | 9.99 images/s | 9.81 images/s |
| HTML 5 | 1.69 Mnodes/s | 1.74 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | 441.15 Krows/s | 454.55 Krows/s |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9609 and Kirin 710FCPU
| Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
| L1 cache | - | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | - | 512 KB |
| Process | 10 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 3 billion | 5.5 billion |
| TDP | 9 W | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G51 |
| Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Execution units | 3 | 4 |
| Shading units | 48 | 64 |
| FLOPS | 259 Gigaflops | 225 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4 |
| Memory frequency | - | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 32 Bit |
| Max size | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | No |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2560 x 1600 | 2340 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 60FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 60FPS | 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 12 | LTE Cat. 12 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 600 Mbps | Up to 600 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 4.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
| Announced | May 2019 | January 2019 |
| Class | Mid range | Mid range |
| Official page | Samsung Exynos 9609 official site | - |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 9