Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Exynos 9609 vs Kirin 710F – what's better?

Exynos 9609 vs Kirin 710F

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 9609 (with Mali-G72 MP3 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 710F (Mali-G51). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 9609
  • Has a smaller size transistor (10 versus 12 nm)
  • Performs 15% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 11%) AnTuTu 8 score – 188K vs 170K
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 710F
  • Higher GPU frequency (~11%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 8

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
188558
170071
CPU 69198 72142
GPU 34563 22406
Memory 47856 36361
UX 33126 32219
Total score 188558 170071

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
330
Multi-Core Score
1359
Image compression 77.65 Mpixels/s 83.85 Mpixels/s
Face detection 11.55 images/s 11.6 images/s
Speech recognition 25.65 words/s 24.15 words/s
Machine learning 18.2 images/s 17 images/s
Camera shooting 9.99 images/s 9.81 images/s
HTML 5 1.69 Mnodes/s 1.74 Mnodes/s
SQLite 441.15 Krows/s 454.55 Krows/s

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9609 and Kirin 710F

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8-A
L1 cache - 256 KB
L2 cache - 512 KB
Process 10 nanometers 12 nanometers
Transistor count 3 billion 5.5 billion
TDP 9 W 5 W

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G72 MP3 Mali-G51
Architecture Bifrost Bifrost
GPU frequency 900 MHz 1000 MHz
Execution units 3 4
Shading units 48 64
FLOPS 259 Gigaflops 225 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.0 1.0
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4 LPDDR4
Memory frequency - 1866 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit
Max size 4 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Yes No
Storage type eMMC 5.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 2560 x 1600 2340 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 1K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 12
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 4
Bluetooth 5.0 4.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced May 2019 January 2019
Class Mid range Mid range
Official page Samsung Exynos 9609 official site -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
6 (66.7%)
3 (33.3%)
Total votes: 9

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 710F and Exynos 9609, or ask any questions