Exynos 9611 vs Kirin 710F

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 9611 (with Mali-G72 MP3 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 710F (Mali-G51 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 9611
  • Has a smaller size transistor (10 versus 12 nm)
  • Performs 15% better in floating-point computations
  • Announced 9-months later
  • Shows better (up to 12%) AnTuTu 9 score – 228K vs 205K
  • 5% higher CPU clock speed (2300 vs 2200 MHz)
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 710F
  • Higher GPU frequency (~18%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
228915
205269
CPU 61042 71013
GPU 57036 32876
Memory 41776 42405
UX 71068 61604
Total score 228915 205269

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Kirin 710F +11%
1335
Image compression 74.7 Mpixels/s 83.85 Mpixels/s
Face detection 11.7 images/s 11.6 images/s
Speech recognition 25 words/s 24.15 words/s
Machine learning 17.7 images/s 17 images/s
Camera shooting 8.82 images/s 9.81 images/s
HTML 5 1.24 Mnodes/s 1.74 Mnodes/s
SQLite 434 Krows/s 454.55 Krows/s

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
776
Stability 97% 97%
Graphics test 4 FPS 3 FPS
Score 776 561

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 31 FPS
[High]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 40 FPS
[Medium]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 43 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 38 FPS
[High]
-
Device Samsung Galaxy A51
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9611 and Kirin 710F

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2300 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8-A
L1 cache - 256 KB
L2 cache - 512 KB
Process 10 nanometers 12 nanometers
Transistor count 3 billion 5.5 billion
TDP 8 W 5 W

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G72 MP3 Mali-G51 MP4
Architecture Bifrost Bifrost
GPU frequency 850 MHz 1000 MHz
Execution units 3 4
Shading units 48 64
FLOPS 259 Gigaflops 225 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.0
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4
Memory frequency 1600 MHz 1866 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit
Max bandwidth 11.9 Gbit/s -
Max size 8 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Yes No
Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 2560 x 1600 2340 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 1K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 120FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem Shannon 337 -
4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 12
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 4
Bluetooth 5.0 4.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced September 2019 January 2019
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E9611 -
Official page Samsung Exynos 9611 official site -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
179 (48.9%)
187 (51.1%)
Total votes: 366

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 710F and Exynos 9611, or ask any questions
Promotion