Exynos 9611 vs Helio G95
We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 9611 (with Mali-G72 MP3 graphics) and MediaTek Helio G95 (Mali-G76MC4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs and comprehensive tests in benchmarks like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Samsung Exynos 9611
- Has the smaller size of the transistor (10 versus 12 nm)
- 12% higher CPU clock speed (2300 vs 2050 MHz)
Pros of MediaTek Helio G95
- Shows significantly better (up to 63%) AnTuTu 8 score – 290K vs 177K
- Announced later
- Higher GPU frequency (~6%)
- Better instruction set architecture
Benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
AnTuTu Benchmark 8
Specifications
CPU
| Architecture | 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2300 MHz | 2050 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process | 10 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 3 billion | - |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G76MC4 |
| Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Cores | 3 | 4 |
| FLOPS | 259 Gigaflops | - |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 32 Bit |
| Max size | 8 GB | 10 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | No | Da Vinci |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2560 x 1600 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265 |
| Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 12 | LTE Cat. 12 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 600 Mbps | Up to 600 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou |
Info
| Announced | September 2019 | September 2020 |
| Class | Mid range | Mid range |
| Official page | Samsung Exynos 9611 official site | MediaTek Helio G95 official site |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 157
Related Comparisons
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Samsung Exynos 9611
- HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
- MediaTek Helio G90T vs Samsung Exynos 9611
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs MediaTek Helio G95
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs MediaTek Helio G95
- MediaTek Helio G90T vs MediaTek Helio G95
- MediaTek Helio G90 vs MediaTek Helio G95
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs MediaTek Helio G95