Exynos 9611 vs MediaTek MT6750

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 9611 (with Mali-G72 MP3 graphics) and MediaTek MT6750 (Mali-T860 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 9611
  • Performs 7.2x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (10 versus 28 nm)
  • Announced 3-years and 2-months later
  • Supports 72% higher memory bandwidth (11.9 against 6.9 GB/s)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~63%)
  • 53% higher CPU clock speed (2300 vs 1500 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
CPU 61042 -
GPU 57036 -
Memory 41776 -
UX 71068 -
Total score 229999 -

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Exynos 9611 +139%
1201
Image compression 74.7 Mpixels/s 39.35 Mpixels/s
Face detection 11.7 images/s 5.7 images/s
Speech recognition 25 words/s 12.65 words/s
Machine learning 17.7 images/s 7.22 images/s
Camera shooting 8.82 images/s 1.87 images/s
HTML 5 1.24 Mnodes/s 0.76 Mnodes/s
SQLite 434 Krows/s 204.3 Krows/s

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Stability 97% -
Graphics test 4 FPS -
Score 776 -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 31 FPS
[High]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 40 FPS
[Medium]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 43 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 38 FPS
[High]
-
Device Samsung Galaxy A51
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9611 and MediaTek MT6750

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1 GHz – Cortex-A53
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2300 MHz 1500 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8-A
Process 10 nanometers 28 nanometers
Transistor count 3 billion 1 billion
TDP 8 W -

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G72 MP3 Mali-T860 MP2
Architecture Bifrost Midgard
GPU frequency 850 MHz 520 MHz
Execution units 3 2
Shading units 48 32
FLOPS 259 Gigaflops 36 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.0
OpenCL version 2.0 1.2
DirectX version 12 11

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR3
Memory frequency 1600 MHz 667 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 1x 32 Bit
Max bandwidth 11.9 Gbit/s 6.9 Gbit/s
Max size 8 GB 4 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Yes No
Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 eMMC 5.1
Max display resolution 2560 x 1600 1280 x 720
Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 16MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 1K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 120FPS 1080p at 30FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265
Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem Shannon 337 -
4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 6
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 300 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 50 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 4
Bluetooth 5.0 4.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced September 2019 August 2016
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E9611 MT6750
Official page Samsung Exynos 9611 official site MediaTek MT6750 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
11 (84.6%)
2 (15.4%)
Total votes: 13

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of MediaTek MT6750 and Exynos 9611, or ask any questions
Promotion