Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Exynos 9611 vs Snapdragon 765 – what's better?

Exynos 9611 vs Snapdragon 765

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 9611 (with Mali-G72 MP3 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (Adreno 620). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs and comprehensive tests in benchmarks like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 9611
  • Higher GPU frequency (~36%)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
  • Performs 2.3x better in floating-point computations
  • Developers optimize games for Snapdragon processors more often than for Exynos
  • Shows significantly better (up to 59%) AnTuTu 8 score – 288K vs 181K
  • Has the smaller size of the transistor (7 versus 10 nm)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
1812
AnTuTu Benchmark 8
181394
288944

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9611 and Snapdragon 765

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
1x 2.3 GHz – Kryo 475 Prime (Cortex-A76)
1x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 475 Gold (Cortex-A76)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2300 MHz 2300 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A -
Process 10 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count 3 billion -

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G72 MP3 Adreno 620
Architecture Bifrost Adreno 600
GPU frequency 850 MHz 625 MHz
Cores 3 -
Number of ALUs - 192
FLOPS 259 Gigaflops 600 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth - 17 Gbit/s
Max size 8 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) No Hexagon 696
Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 2560 x 1600 3200 x 1800
Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem - X52
4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 24
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 1200 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 210 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.0 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS

Info

Announced September 2019 December 2019
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number - SM7250-AA
Official page Samsung Exynos 9611 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
16 (32.7%)
33 (67.3%)
Total votes: 49

Comments

Here you can give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 765 and Exynos 9611 or ask any questions