Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Exynos 9611 vs Exynos 2100 – what's better?

Exynos 9611 vs Exynos 2100

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 9611 (with Mali-G72 MP3 graphics) and Exynos 2100 (Mali-G78 MP14). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 9611
  • Higher GPU frequency (~12%)
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2100
  • Shows significantly better (up to 3.8x) AnTuTu 8 score – 690K vs 182K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 10 nm)
  • 26% higher CPU clock speed (2900 vs 2300 MHz)
  • Announced 1-year and 3-months later
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 8

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
182562
Exynos 2100 +278%
690091
CPU 55979 198813
GPU 48708 275313
Memory 43050 123685
UX 38397 87930
Total score 182562 690091

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Exynos 2100 +229%
1086
Multi-Core Score
Exynos 2100 +200%
3636
Image compression 74.7 Mpixels/s 170.5 Mpixels/s
Face detection 11.7 images/s 26.7 images/s
Speech recognition 25 words/s 64.15 words/s
Machine learning 17.7 images/s 51.35 images/s
Camera shooting 8.82 images/s 33.9 images/s
HTML 5 1.24 Mnodes/s 3.21 Mnodes/s
SQLite 434 Krows/s 970.15 Krows/s

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 31 FPS
[High]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 40 FPS
[Medium]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 43 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 38 FPS
[High]
-
Device Samsung Galaxy A51
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9611 and Exynos 2100

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-X1
3x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2300 MHz 2900 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8.4-A
Process 10 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count 3 billion -
TDP 8 W 9 W

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G72 MP3 Mali-G78 MP14
Architecture Bifrost Vallhall 2
GPU frequency 850 MHz 760 MHz
Execution units 3 14
Shading units 48 224
FLOPS 259 Gigaflops -
Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth - 51.2 Gbit/s
Max size 8 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) No Yes
Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2560 x 1600 4096 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 24
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 3000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 422 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.0 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC

Info

Announced September 2019 December 2020
Class Mid range Flagship
Official page Samsung Exynos 9611 official site Samsung Exynos 2100 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
36 (41.9%)
50 (58.1%)
Total votes: 86

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Exynos 2100 and Exynos 9611, or ask any questions