Exynos 9810 vs Snapdragon 662
We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 9810 (with Mali-G72 MP18 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (Adreno 610). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Samsung Exynos 9810
- Supports 106% higher memory bandwidth (28.7 against 13.9 GB/s)
- Shows significantly better (up to 2x) AnTuTu 9 score – 404K vs 203K
- 45% higher CPU clock speed (2900 vs 2000 MHz)
- Performs 52% better in floating-point computations
- Has a smaller size transistor (10 versus 11 nm)
- Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
- Higher GPU frequency (~66%)
- Announced 2-years and 1-month later
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 9
| CPU | 116977 | 69897 |
| GPU | 121725 | 33653 |
| Memory | 74973 | 45576 |
| UX | 93023 | 55919 |
| Total score | 404010 | 203653 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | 112.6 Mpixels/s | 88.3 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | 22.9 images/s | 13.3 images/s |
| Speech recognition | 46.4 words/s | 23.4 words/s |
| Machine learning | 43.5 images/s | 17.4 images/s |
| Camera shooting | 17.6 images/s | 11.2 images/s |
| HTML 5 | 1.85 Mnodes/s | 1.89 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | 637.6 Krows/s | 503.5 Krows/s |
3DMark
3DMark Wild Life Performance
| Stability | 93% | 99% |
| Graphics test | 13 FPS | 2 FPS |
| Score | 2272 | 372 |
Gaming
| PUBG Mobile | - | 28 FPS [Low] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | - | 30 FPS [Ultra] |
| Fortnite | - | 26 FPS [Low] |
| Shadowgun Legends | - | 54 FPS [Low] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | - | 59 FPS [Medium] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | - | 30 FPS [High] |
| Device | - | Xiaomi Poco M3 1080 x 2340 |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9810 and Snapdragon 662CPU
| Architecture | 4x 2.9 GHz – Exynos M3 4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73) 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53) |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2900 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | - |
| Process | 10 nanometers | 11 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 5.3 billion | 1.75 billion |
| TDP | 5 W | 4 W |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G72 MP18 | Adreno 610 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 2 | Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 572 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Execution units | 18 | 2 |
| Shading units | 288 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 370 Gigaflops | 243 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1800 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 32 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 28.7 Gbit/s | 13.9 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Hexagon 683 |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 28MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Shannon 360 | X11 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 13 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 1200 Mbps | Up to 390 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 200 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | January 2018 | January 2020 |
| Class | Flagship | Mid range |
| Model number | S5E9810 | SM615 |
| Official page | Samsung Exynos 9810 official site | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 official site |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 56