Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Exynos 9810 vs Snapdragon 768G – what's better?

Exynos 9810 vs Snapdragon 768G

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 9810 (with Mali-G72MP18 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G (Adreno 620). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs and comprehensive tests in benchmarks like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 9810
  • Supports 58% higher memory bandwidth (26.82 against 17 GB/s)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~13%)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
  • Developers optimize games for Snapdragon processors more often than for Exynos
  • Announced 2 years and 5 months later
  • Has the smaller size of the transistor (7 versus 10 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 10%) AnTuTu 8 score – 353K vs 320K
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
AnTuTu Benchmark 8
320171
353173

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9810 and Snapdragon 768G

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.9 GHz – Exynos M3
4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 2.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Prime (Cortex-A76)
1x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 475 Gold (Cortex-A76)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 475 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2900 MHz 2800 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.3-A
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 10 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count 5.3 billion -

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G72MP18 Adreno 620
Architecture Bifrost Adreno 600
GPU frequency 850 MHz 750 MHz
Cores 18 -
Number of ALUs - 192
FLOPS 370 Gigaflops -
Vulkan version 1.0 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12 12

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1800 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 26.82 Gbit/s 17 Gbit/s
Max size 6 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 696
Storage type UFS 2.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3200 x 1800
Max camera resolution 1x 24MP, 2x 16MP 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem Shannon 360 LTE X52
4G support LTE Cat. 19 LTE Cat. 24
5G support No Yes
Download speed Up to 1200 Mbps Up to 1200 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 200 Mbps Up to 210 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.0 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS

Info

Announced January 2018 May 2020
Class Flagship Mid range
Model number - SM7250-AC
Official page Samsung Exynos 9810 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 1

Comments

Here you can give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 768G and Exynos 9810 or ask any questions