Exynos 9825 vs Kirin 990 (4G)
We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 9825 (with Mali G76 MP12 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) (Mali G76 MP16). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs and comprehensive tests in benchmarks like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Samsung Exynos 9825
- Performs 23% better in floating-point computations
- Better instruction set architecture
- Shows better (up to 5%) AnTuTu 8 score – 445K vs 424K
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G)
- 5% higher CPU clock speed (2860 vs 2730 MHz)
Benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
AnTuTu Benchmark 8
Specifications
CPU
| Architecture | 2x 2.73 GHz – M4 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 2.09 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.86 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2730 MHz | 2860 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | - |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | - |
| Process | 7 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 8.5 billion | 8 billion |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali G76 MP12 | Mali G76 MP16 |
| Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Cores | 12 | 16 |
| FLOPS | 943 Gigaflops | 768 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.0 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 31.1 Gbit/s | 31.78 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Da Vinci |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2400 | 3360 x 1440 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 24MP, 2x 16MP | - |
| Video capture | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 150FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VC-1 |
| Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 20 | LTE Cat. 21 |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 2000 Mbps | Up to 1400 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 316 Mbps | Up to 200 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou |
Info
| Announced | August 2019 | October 2019 |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Official page | Samsung Exynos 9825 official site | HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) official site |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 7
Related Comparisons
- Samsung Exynos 9825 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
- Samsung Exynos 9825 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
- Samsung Exynos 9825 and Samsung Exynos 9820
- Samsung Exynos 9825 and Samsung Exynos 990
- Samsung Exynos 9825 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
- HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
- HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
- HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) and Apple A13 Bionic
- HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) and Samsung Exynos 9820
- HiSilicon Kirin 990 (4G) and HiSilicon Kirin 990 (5G)