Tiger T610 vs Exynos 9610

We compared two 8-core processors: Unisoc Tiger T610 (with ARM Mali G52 MP2 graphics) and Samsung Exynos 9610 (Mali-G72 MP3). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Unisoc Tiger T610
  • Announced 1-year and 3-months later
  • Supports 9% higher memory bandwidth (13 against 11.92 GB/s)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Samsung Exynos 9610
  • Performs 3.6x better in floating-point computations
  • Higher GPU frequency (~38%)
  • 28% higher CPU clock speed (2300 vs 1800 MHz)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (10 versus 12 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 15%) AnTuTu 9 score – 202K vs 175K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
175785
202977
CPU 68033 63795
GPU 33458 40094
Memory 35470 39989
UX 39886 59892
Total score 175785 202977

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
351
Multi-Core Score
Tiger T610 +17%
1321
Image compression 73.5 Mpixels/s 75.5 Mpixels/s
Face detection 8.73 images/s 11.45 images/s
Speech recognition 23.6 words/s 25.25 words/s
Machine learning 17.2 images/s 17.85 images/s
Camera shooting 7.86 images/s 8.13 images/s
HTML 5 1.28 Mnodes/s 1.12 Mnodes/s
SQLite 400.6 Krows/s 394.4 Krows/s

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Stability - 96%
Graphics test - 4 FPS
Score - 740

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Tiger T610 and Exynos 9610

CPU

Architecture 2x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
Cores 8 8
Frequency 1800 MHz 2300 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A
L1 cache 128 KB -
L2 cache 2 MB -
L3 cache 1 MB -
Process 12 nanometers 10 nanometers
Transistor count - 3 billion
TDP 10 W 8 W

Graphics

GPU name ARM Mali G52 MP2 Mali-G72 MP3
Architecture Bifrost Bifrost
GPU frequency 614 MHz 850 MHz
Execution units 2 3
Shading units 32 48
FLOPS 71.2 Gigaflops 259 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.0 1.0
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 11 12

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1800 MHz 1600 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 13 Gbit/s 11.92 Gbit/s
Max size 6 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) No Yes
Storage type eMMC 5.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 2160 x 1080 2560 x 1600
Max camera resolution 1x 16MP, 2x 8MP 1x 24MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 1K at 30FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 1080p at 30FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 7 LTE Cat. 7
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 300 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced June 2019 March 2018
Class Low end Mid range
Model number - S5E9610
Official page - Samsung Exynos 9610 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
7 (53.8%)
6 (46.2%)
Total votes: 13

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Exynos 9610 and Tiger T610, or ask any questions