Tiger T618 vs Exynos 9611

We compared two 8-core processors: Unisoc Tiger T618 (with ARM Mali-G52 MP2 graphics) and Samsung Exynos 9611 (Mali-G72 MP3). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Unisoc Tiger T618
  • Shows better (up to 9%) AnTuTu 9 score – 252K vs 232K
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Samsung Exynos 9611
  • 15% higher CPU clock speed (2300 vs 2000 MHz)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (10 versus 12 nm)
We may receive a commission from Amazon for purchases made using the links below.

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
252767
232464
CPU 69359 61042
GPU 48246 57036
Memory 64278 41776
UX 69749 71068
Total score 252767 232464

GeekBench 5

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Tiger T618 +21%
396
Multi-Core Score
Tiger T618 +11%
1343
Image compression 90.5 Mpixels/s 68.2 Mpixels/s
Face detection 10.7 images/s 11.6 images/s
Speech recognition 23.3 words/s 24.3 words/s
Machine learning 19.2 images/s 17.7 images/s
Camera shooting 10.4 images/s 8.41 images/s
HTML 5 1.52 Mnodes/s 1.29 Mnodes/s
SQLite 452.6 Krows/s 409.6 Krows/s

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Stability - 97%
Graphics test - 4 FPS
Score - 776

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 31 FPS
[High]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 40 FPS
[Medium]
World of Tanks Blitz - 43 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 38 FPS
[High]
Device - Samsung Galaxy A51
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Tiger T618 and Exynos 9611

CPU

Architecture 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2000 MHz 2300 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A
Process 12 nanometers 10 nanometers
Transistor count - 3 billion
TDP 10 W 8 W

Graphics

GPU name ARM Mali-G52 MP2 Mali-G72 MP3
Architecture Bifrost Bifrost
GPU frequency 850 MHz 850 MHz
Execution units 2 3
Shading units 32 48
FLOPS - 259 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.0 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 11 12

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1866 MHz 1600 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth - 11.9 Gbit/s
Max size 6 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Neural processor (NPU) No Yes
Storage type eMMC 5.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 2160 x 1080 2560 x 1600
Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 1K at 30FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 1080p at 30FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs H.264, H.265 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Shannon 337
4G support LTE Cat. 7 LTE Cat. 12
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 300 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.0 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced August 2019 September 2019
Class Low end Mid range
Model number - S5E9611
Official page - Samsung Exynos 9611 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
52 (35.6%)
94 (64.4%)
Total votes: 146

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Exynos 9611 and Tiger T618, or ask any questions
Promotion