Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 – an 8-core chipset that was announced on February 18, 2015, and is manufactured using a 28-nanometer process technology. It has 4 cores Cortex-A72 at 1800 MHz and 4 cores Cortex-A53 at 1400 MHz.
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks
AnTuTu 8
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652
97253
| CPU |
40781 |
| GPU |
19716 |
| Memory |
22996 |
| UX |
10216 |
| Total score |
97253 |
GeekBench 5
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
| Image compression |
52.7 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection |
7.81 images/s |
| Speech recognition |
20.2 words/s |
| Machine learning |
12.7 images/s |
| Camera shooting |
5.67 images/s |
| HTML 5 |
948.2 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite |
281.25 Krows/s |
Smartphones
Click on the device name to view detailed information
Specifications
Detailed specifications of the Snapdragon 652 SoC with Adreno 510 graphics
| Architecture |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A72
4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Cores |
8 |
| Frequency |
1800 MHz |
| Instruction set |
ARMv8-A |
| L1 cache |
256 KB |
| Process |
28 nanometers |
| Transistor count |
1 billion |
| GPU name |
Adreno 510 |
| Architecture |
Adreno 500 |
| GPU frequency |
600 MHz |
| Execution units |
1 |
| Shading units |
128 |
| FLOPS |
153 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version |
1.0 |
| OpenCL version |
2.0 |
| DirectX version |
11.1 |
| Memory type |
LPDDR3 |
| Memory frequency |
933 MHz |
| Bus |
2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth |
14.9 Gbit/s |
| Max size |
4 GB |
| Neural processor (NPU) |
No |
| Storage type |
eMMC 5.1 |
| Max display resolution |
2560 x 1600 |
| Max camera resolution |
1x 21MP, 2x 13MP |
| Video capture |
4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback |
4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs |
H.264, H.265, VP8 |
| Audio codecs |
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
| Modem |
X8 |
| 4G support |
LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G support |
No |
| Download speed |
Up to 300 Mbps |
| Upload speed |
Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi |
5 |
| Bluetooth |
4.1 |
| Navigation |
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
Comparison with competitors
