Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus vs AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.7 GHz Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus with 24-cores against the 4.3 GHz AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D with 16-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
🔌 Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click “Calculate".
Currency
VS
136.0
(Excellent)
Value Index
41.5
(Average)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 9950X3D and Plus
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
  • More powerful Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores) integrated graphics: 2 vs 0.6 TFLOPS
  • Newer - released 1 year and 2 months later
  • Has 8 more physical cores
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 4 nanometers
  • Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-7200 RAM
  • Around 25.6 GB/s (29%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
  • More than 10° C higher critical temperature
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D
  • Has 92 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • 6% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.7 GHz vs 5.4 GHz)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 595 753
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 9722 9861
Cinebench Scores (4th and 6th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 2000 MB/sec 1800 MB/sec
Clang compilation 297.3 Klines/sec 241.4 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 635.2 pages/sec 392.8 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 716 Mpixels/sec 624.1 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 447.5 pages/sec 357.5 pages/sec
Background blur 116 images/sec 81.9 images/sec
Photo processing 210.5 images/sec 143.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 59 Mpixels/sec 55.9 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 175.8 GOps/sec 242.7 GOps/sec
Floating point math 229.2 GOps/sec 159.5 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 612M Primes/sec 609M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 96.8M Strings/sec 95.3M Strings/sec
Data encryption 59 GBytes/sec 44.4 GBytes/sec
Data compression 803 MBytes/sec 905.8 MBytes/sec
Physics 4038 Frames/sec 5662 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 63.4B Matrices/sec 72.9B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 1837 & 11549 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 19.9 PPW 14.4 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 219.2 PPW 132.6 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 547.7 PPW 412.3 PPW
Blender / Watt 4.92 PPW 3.63 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-12 (coolguy)Cinebench 20260 / 8872
📘 2026-06-25 (Adnan)Cinebench 2024144 / 2490
📘 2026-06-13 (sparehobos)Cinebench 2024147 / 2614
📘 2026-04-11 (Daniel Comeau)Cinebench 2026568 / 8929
📘 2026-04-07 (IdiotStick)Cinebench 2026595 / 9722
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-01 (Soutajupe)Cinebench 2024146 / 2634
📘 2026-08-02 (Naragan)Cinebench 2024143 / 2632
📘 2026-08-02 (Naragan)Cinebench 2026794 / 10890
📘 2026-08-02 (Naragan)Geekbench 6 CPU3553 / 25131
📘 2026-07-10 (omecha)Cinebench 2026753 / 9861

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D

General

Vendor Intel Amd
Released March 12, 2026 January 7, 2025
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Zen 5 (Granite Ridge)
Model number 270K+ 9950X3D
Integrated GPU Arc iGPU (4-Cores) Radeon Graphics
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 9 9950X -
Intel CPU rating (#1st place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 16
P-Threads 8 32
Base Frequency (P) 3.7 GHz 4.3 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.4 GHz 5.7 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 16 -
E-Threads 16 -
Base Frequency (E) 3.2 GHz -
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.7 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 24 16
Total Threads 24 32
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 37x 43x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 3MB (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 36MB (shared) 128MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes Yes

Package

Transistors 17.8 billions -
Fabrication Process 3 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 125 W 170 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 250 W 230 W
Socket FCLGA-1851 AM5
Peak Temperature 105°C 95°C
Desktop CPU ranking (2nd and 5th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores) Radeon Graphics
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 400 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2000 MHz 2200 MHz
Shading Units 512 128
TMUs 32 8
ROPs 16 4
Execution Units 64 2
TGP 14 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
2 TFLOPS
0.6 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-7200 - DDR5-5600
Max. Memory Size 256 GB 192 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 115.2 GB/s 89.6 GB/s
ECC Support Yes Yes

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus official page AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 24 28

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
130 (84.4%)
24 (15.6%)
Total votes: 154

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D or Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Beloved August 21, 2026 at 05:06 PM
Intel is giving a very promising competitive future let's see how does amd do, but THE TRUTH has to be said: very small but better productivity performance on the intel side and just lacking about 8~9% in gaming on half the price: INTEL WON THIS YEAR ( if zen 6 doesn't launch this year)
0 Reply
Avatar
Leonid April 2, 2026 at 11:36 PM
It´s a good CPU but it comes with LGA1851 mainboard, which is already the last supported Release it´s basically a dead platform.
+5 Reply
Avatar
Phenro April 6, 2026 at 08:05 AM
Not everyone upgrades every fucking year. Its a CPU meant to be used for atleast 6 to 7 years. The platform barely fucking matters
+22 Reply
Avatar
Bora April 8, 2026 at 12:52 PM
I was about to buy parts for my new computer. I was exactly thinking like you. But then I realize that I'm going to use this system for more than 10 years probably. So it's doesn't make sense in my side. I'm switching from almost 15 year old entry tier platform. Lol
+8 Reply
Avatar
Manu May 12, 2026 at 04:30 PM
Phenro, You say that but, I Wanted to change my setup this year, I thought about this 270k plus. But when I think that the new gen is comming, it does'nt make any sense to buy this garbage. Intel has a fkng busisness with brands. I prefer to wait the new gen and see what AMD and Intel will offer before making a desperate decission
0 Reply
Avatar
Anarchist July 17, 2026 at 11:52 PM
Manu, Your anecdotal evidence isn't representative of everyone. That's the trap though. You wait for the new gen? "oh wait but there are rumors of the NEXT cpu after that potenntially being better" The cycle never ends. You've fallen into the cpu upgrade trap. Just buy it and forget about it and don't worry about what social media and these tech creators and benchmarkers. 1. cpus are... so good now. the min and max gpu that you can pair with any modern cpu overlaps heavily among each other 2. cpus are releasing every 2-3 years now. if you genuinely upgrade that often, you'd need a VERY good reason why 3. if you're upgrading every 6-7 years... well the platform is already done by then anyway
+1 Reply
Avatar
soul reaper🌹 March 29, 2026 at 03:01 PM
after a longg period intel mogges amd🥵 (no hate btw)
+11 Reply
Avatar
ThePellicans March 27, 2026 at 08:16 AM
We'll see what AMD have to offer us, but so far, this new intel cpu is at the top tier in the market now.
+8 Reply
Ziad March 16, 2026 at 07:11 PM
Finally Intel did something good
+13 Reply