Home > CPU Comparison > Core Ultra 9 285H or Ryzen AI Max 390: what's better?

Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

69 out of 100
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
VS
76 out of 100
AMD Ryzen AI Max 390
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.9 GHz Intel Core Ultra 9 285H with 16-cores against the 3.2 GHz AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 with 12-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Specs
  5. Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 390 and 285H
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 4 nanometers
  • Has 4 more physical cores
  • Newer PCI Express version – 5.0
  • More than 10Β° C higher critical temperature
  • 8% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.4 GHz vs 5 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen AI Max 390
  • Has 40 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • More powerful Radeon 8050S integrated graphics: 11.5 vs 4.8 TFLOPS
  • Supports quad-channel memory

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks
CPU:
Core Ultra 9 285H
vs
Ryzen AI Max 390

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 506 -
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 4879 -
Cinebench Scores (123rd and 85th place)
Submit your benchmark results

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1510 MB/sec 1650 MB/sec
Clang compilation 129.7 Klines/sec 153.6 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 425.7 pages/sec 426.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 522.7 Mpixels/sec 483.3 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 309.2 pages/sec 307.1 pages/sec
Background blur 73.9 images/sec 72.3 images/sec
Photo processing 159.5 images/sec 191.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 26.8 Mpixels/sec 32.4 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 86 GOps/sec 146.5 GOps/sec
Floating point math 109.3 GOps/sec 90.6 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 330M Primes/sec 316M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 41M Strings/sec 53.1M Strings/sec
Data encryption 26.2 GBytes/sec 25.1 GBytes/sec
Data compression 336.1 MBytes/sec 487.1 MBytes/sec
Physics 2512 Frames/sec 2761 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 26.8B Matrices/sec 38.7B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 2125 & 28 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
Core Ultra 9 285H
205.02
Ryzen AI Max 390 +67%
342.35

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 24.9 PPW 24.7 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 381.6 PPW 344.6 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 759.8 PPW 758.9 PPW
Blender / Watt 4.56 PPW 6.22 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-16 (AsNapur)Geekbench 6 CPU2756 / 16837
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-16 (AsNapur)Cinebench 2024122 / 1126
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-31 (Adi)Cinebench 2024114 / 804
πŸ“˜ 2025-09-19 (JacoIsHere)Geekbench 6 CPU2868 / 14847
πŸ“˜ 2025-08-07 (Himmanshu Chowdhury)Cinebench 2024117 / 1122
Add View all (6)
AMD Ryzen AI Max 390
No benchmark results yet
Add

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 9 285H and AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

General

Vendor Intel Amd
Released January 6, 2025 January 7, 2025
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Zen 5 (Strix Halo)
Model number 285H 390
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics 140T Radeon 8050S
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 - Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
Intel CPU rating (#46th place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#16th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 6 12
P-Threads 6 24
Base Frequency (P) 2.9 GHz 3.2 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.4 GHz 5 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 10 -
E-Threads 10 -
Base Frequency (E) 2.7 GHz -
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.5 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 16 12
Total Threads 16 24
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 29x 32x
L1 Cache 112K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 2MB (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 24MB (shared) 64MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 3 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 35-45 W (configurable) 45-55 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 115 W 120 W
Socket FCBGA-2049 FP11
Peak Temperature 110Β°C 100Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (58th and 27th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Arc Graphics 140T Radeon 8050S
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 1295 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2350 MHz 2800 MHz
Shading Units 1024 2048
TMUs 64 128
ROPs 32 64
Execution Units 8 32
TGP 35 W 55 W
iGPU FLOPS
Core Ultra 9 285H
4.8 TFLOPS
Ryzen AI Max 390 +140%
11.5 TFLOPS
More info: Radeon 8050S compared to Arc 140T

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5-8400
- LPDDR5x-8400
- DDR5-6400		 - LPDDR5X-8000
Max. Memory Size 128 GB 128 GB
Memory Channels 2 4
Max. Memory Bandwidth - 256 GB/s
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 9 285H official page AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 4.0
PCI Express Lanes 28 16

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
4 (28.6%)
10 (71.4%)
Total votes: 14

Competitors

1. Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
2. Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
3. Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Core i9 14900HX
4. Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (11)
5. Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
6. AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 vs Intel Core Ultra X9 378H
7. AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 vs Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
8. AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
9. AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 vs AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX
10. AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 vs AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (1)
Compare other CPUs (460+)

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 or Intel Core Ultra 9 285H?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский