Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus (X2P-42-100) vs Apple M5 (8-сore GPU)
We compared two laptop CPUs: the 4,04 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus (X2P-42-100) with 6-cores against the 4.61 GHz Apple M5 (8-сore GPU) with 10-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
Review
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
Key Differences
Advantages of Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus (X2P-42-100)
- Supports up to 64 GB LPDDR5X-9523 RAM
Advantages of Apple M5 (8-сore GPU)
- Has 4 more physical cores
- More powerful Apple M5 GPU (8-core) integrated graphics: 3.3 vs 2.1 TFLOPS
- 29% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 4186 vs 3238 points
Test in Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasksCinebench
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench Scores (#119th place)
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
PassMark
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
| Integer math | 36.4 GOps/sec | - |
| Floating point math | 56.9 GOps/sec | - |
| Find prime numbers | 212M Primes/sec | - |
| Random string sorting | 23.9M Strings/sec | - |
| Data encryption | 9.9 GBytes/sec | - |
| Data compression | 165.4 MBytes/sec | - |
| Physics | 1445 Frames/sec | - |
| Extended instructions | 10.7B Matrices/sec | - |
Blender
Blender CPU
Performance Per Watt
| Cinebench 2024 / Watt | 75.2 PPW | 42.6 PPW |
| Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt | 1195.7 PPW | 634.1 PPW |
| Passmark CPU Mark / Watt | 1698 PPW | - |
| Blender / Watt | 17.2 PPW | - |
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.
Recent User Tests
Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus (X2P-42-100)
No benchmark results yet
Apple M5 (8-сore GPU)
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-07-03 (Mahesh Kondraju) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 4224 / 17165 |
| 📘 2026-05-02 -> fedwim | Geekbench 6 CPU | 4120 / 15800 |
Specifications
Full technical specification of Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus (X2P-42-100) and Apple M5 (8-сore GPU)General
| Vendor | Qualcomm | Apple |
| Released | January 5, 2026 | March 3, 2026 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set | ARMv9 | ARMv9 |
| Codename | Snapdragon X | Apple M5 |
| Model number | X2P-42-100 | T8142 |
| Integrated GPU | Adreno X2-45 | Apple M5 GPU (8-core) |
| Rival Equivalent | - Apple M2 | - |
CPU
| P-Cores | 6 | 4 |
| P-Threads | 6 | 4 |
| Base Frequency (P) | 4,04 GHz | 4.61 GHz |
| E-Cores | - | 6 |
| E-Threads | - | 6 |
| Base Frequency (E) | - | 3.0 GHz |
| Total Cores | 6 | 10 |
| Total Threads | 6 | 10 |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 34x | 46x |
| L1 Cache | 288K (per core) | 192K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 12MB (shared) | 22MB (shared) |
| L3 Cache | 6MB (shared) | - |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Transistors | - | 28 billions |
| Fabrication Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| TDP (PL1) | 10 W | 27 W |
| Max. Boost TDP (PL2) | 22 W | - |
| Socket | Custom | Apple M-Socket |
| Peak Temperature | - | 100°C |
| Die Size | - | 157.48 mm² |
Laptop processors ranking (71st and 20th place)
iGPU
| Integrated Graphics | Adreno X2-45 | Apple M5 GPU (8-core) |
| GPU Base Clock | 500 MHz | - |
| GPU Boost Clock | 910 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Shading Units | 1152 | 1024 |
| TMUs | 72 | 64 |
| ROPs | 36 | 32 |
| Execution Units | - | 128 |
iGPU FLOPS
Memory Support
| Memory Types | - LPDDR5X-9523 | - LPDDR5X-9600 |
| Max. Memory Size | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory Channels | 8 | 8 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 152 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | No |
Misc
| Official Site | Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus (X2P-42-100) official page | - |
| PCI Express Version | 4.0 | - |
| PCI Express Lanes | 12 | - |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 2