AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE vs 7900 GRE

We compared two discrete desktop gaming GPUs: the Radeon RX 9070 GRE 12 GB with 48 pipelines and 3072 shaders against the 7900 GRE 16 GB that utilizes 5120 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
Scores marked with a red asterisk (**) represent initial estimates from early testing.

Value for money (Beta)

We use average GPU prices from all manufacturers by default. Enter the current price of a specific card for better accuracy.
Currency
12 GB GDDR6
VS
16 GB GDDR6
80.7
(Good)
Value Index
59.2
(Average)

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of RX 7900 GRE over RX 9070 GRE
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 9070 GRE
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 4 nm process technology
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 7900 GRE
  • 34% higher maximum theoretical performance (46 vs 34.3 TFLOPS)
  • Includes 4 GB more video memory
  • Has 33% higher memory bandwidth: 576 vs 432 GB/s
  • Has 67% more shading units (5120 vs 3072)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5 -
212
144
126
91
The Witcher 3 -
220
201
145
76
Counter-Strike 2 -
304
212
152
81
Far Cry 6 -
180
155
138
88
Hogwarts Legacy -
137
108
87
50
CoD: Modern Warfare III -
199
187
138
92
Ghost of Tsushima -
139
119
98
59
Cyberpunk 2077 -
154
133
95
44
Shadow of the Tomb Raider -
233
225
171
88
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High - 198
1080p Ultra - 165
1440p Ultra - 128
4K Ultra - 74
Margin of Error High Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy - 22544
Solar Bay - 90933
Port Royal - 12467
Fire Strike - 56225
Wild Life Extreme - 41755
Night Raid - 169714
Sources: 3DMark [1]

GeekBench 6 GPU Compute

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur - 352.4 img/sec
Face Detection - 229 img/sec
Horizon Detection - 6.42 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection - 8.86 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur - 7.89 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching - 1.5 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching - 662.8 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics - 24012 FPS
API - OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
23533
27453
G2D Mark 1261 1212
DirectX 11 254 FPS 300 FPS
DirectX 12 56 FPS 111 FPS
GPU Compute 14796 Ops/s 15210 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 171 & 2161 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
2351.88
2825.7
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 12 & 261 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) - 15095
Image Segmentation (HP) - 21206
Image Super Resolution (Q) - 33962
Face Detection (HP) - 57614
Pose Estimation (Q) - 214748
Text Classification (SP) - 4325
Machine Translation (HP) - 6598
Object Detection (SP) - 16608
Depth Estimation (Q) - 57731
Style Transfer (SP) - 394987
Framework - ONNX
Backend - DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon RX 9070 GRE and 7900 GRE

General

Vendor Amd Amd
Build Discrete Discrete
Released August 27, 2025 -
Launch price (MSRP) $549 $649
Case Desktop Desktop
Purpose Gaming Gaming
Segment High-end High-end
Architecture RDNA 4.0 RDNA 3.0
GPU Codename Navi 48 Navi 31
Rival Equivalent - GeForce RTX 5060 Ti (8GB) -
Recommended CPU - Intel Core Ultra 5 245K or above -
Desktop GPU rating (25th and 18th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 1420 MHz 1287 MHz
Boost Clock 2790 MHz 2245 MHz
Shading Units 3072 5120
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 192 320
Render Output Units (ROPs) 96 160
Compute Units (Pipelines) 48 -
Tensor Cores 96 -
Ray-tracing Cores 48 80
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 256KB per cluster
L2 Cache 8MB shared 6MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 4 IPC 4 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 268 GPixel/s 359 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 536 GTexel/s 718 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
34.3 TFLOPS
46 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 220 W 260 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 4 nm 5 nm
Die Size 357 mm² 529 mm²
Transistor Count 53.9 billion 57 billion
Transistor Density 150.98 MTr/mm² 107.75 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Size 12 GB 16 GB
Memory Clock 2250 MHz 2250 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 18000 Mbps 18000 Mbps
Bus 192-bit 256-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
432 GB/s
576 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.4 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.2 2.2
CUDA No -
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1a 2.1

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!