Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED (Q533/N6506) vs Apple MacBook Pro 16 (M3, 2023)

Please select specific configurations for the laptops to get a more accurate comparative review
Display
3456 x 2234
CPU
GPU
Apple M3 Pro GPU (18-core)
RAM
Storage

Review

Evaluation of Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED (Q533/N6506) and Apple MacBook Pro 16 (M3, 2023) important characteristics
Performance
System and application performance
Gaming
Performance in popular 3D games
Display
Viewing angle, color accuracy, brightness
Battery Life
Potential battery life in light and average use
Connectivity
Ports, webcam and other interfaces
Portability
Design, materials, durability and usability
Pick the usage scenario that best matches your needs
Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Please input up-to-date prices for the selected laptop configurations to get an accurate value-for-money index.
Currency
VS
51.3
(Average)
Value Index
45.4
(Average)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between the notebooks
Advantages of the Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED (Q533/N6506)
  • Includes an old-school USB-A port
  • Easier to carry: weighs 340 grams less (around 0.75 lbs)
  • User-upgradable RAM (up to 24GB) and an SSD
  • Better webcam recording quality
Advantages of the Apple MacBook Pro 16 (M3, 2023)
  • Higher screen refresh rate: 120 versus 60 Hz
  • MacBook with the Apple M3 Pro chip maintains its performance even when running on battery power.
  • Higher number of cutting-edge USB Type-C ports: 3 versus 2
  • Thinner bezels and 7% higher screen-to-body ratio
  • Features a much bigger (~33%) battery – 100 against 75 watt-hours
  • Around 11% better multi-core CPU performance in the Cinebench 2024 test
  • 80% sharper screen – 254 versus 141 pixels per inch (PPI)

Tests and Specifications

Comparison table of test results and technical specs

Case

Weight 1.8 kg (3.97 lbs) 2.14 kg (4.72 lbs)
Dimensions 355.7 x 235.3 x 19.9 mm
14 x 9.26 x 0.78 inches
355.7 x 248.1 x 16.8 mm
14 x 9.77 x 0.66 inches
Area 837 cm2 (129.6 inches2) 882 cm2 (136.8 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio ~80.2% ~86.2%
Side bezels 5.2 mm 3.4 mm
Colors Silver, Gray Black, Gray
Material Top: Aluminum
Middle: Plastic
Bottom: Plastic
Aluminum
Transformer No No
Opening angle 180° 135°
Size comparison
Cooling solution
Cooling system Active Active
Vapor chamber No No
Liquid metal No No
Number of fans 2 2
Max. fan speed (RPM) - 6000 RPM
Noise level (max. load) 58.5 dB 42.8 dB

Display

Size 15.6 inches 16.2 inches
Type OLED Mini LED
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate - Yes (24-120 Hz)
PPI 141 ppi 254 ppi
Aspect ratio 16:9 16:10
Resolution 1920 x 1080 pixels 3456 x 2234 pixels
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Sync technology No No
Touchscreen No No
Coating Glossy (Antireflective) Glossy (Antireflective)
Ambient light sensor - Yes
Screen space comparison
MacBook Pro 16 (M3, 2023)
16.2″ (16:10 ratio) = 118 in2
Vivobook Pro 15 OLED (Q533/N6506)
15.6″ (16:9 ratio) = 104 in2
~13% more screen space
Display tests
Contrast 1000000:1 1000000:1
sRGB color space 100% 100%
Adobe RGB profile 97% -
DCI-P3 color gamut 100% 100%
Response time 1 ms 58 ms

Battery

Capacity
Full charging time - 1:25 hr
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Fast charging Yes Yes
Charging via USB (Power Delivery) Yes Yes, 140 W
Charging port position Right Left, Right
Charge power 200 W 140 W
Cable length - 2 meters
Weight of AC adapter 571 grams 347 grams

CPU

CPU name
Base frequency 1.4 GHz 4.05 GHz
Turbo frequency 4.8 GHz -
Cores 16 (6P + 10E) 12 (6P + 6E)
Threads 22 12
L3 Cache 24 MB -
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics (8-Cores) Apple M3 Pro GPU (18-core)
Fabrication process 7 nm 3 nm

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)

Graphics Card

GPU name
TGP - 30 W
Nvidia Optimus MUX -
Type Dedicated Integrated
Fabrication process 8 nm 3 nm
GPU base clock - 500 MHz
GPU boost clock - 1380 MHz
FLOPS 4.3-7.1 TFLOPS 6.4 TFLOPS
Memory size 6 GB System Shared
Memory type GDDR6 LPDDR5
Memory bus 128 bit 192 bit
Memory speed ~12 Gbps 6.4 Gbps
Shading units (cores) 2048 2304
Texture mapping units (TMUs) 64 144
Raster operations pipelines (ROPs) 40 72
GPU performance 4.3-7.1 TFLOPS 6.4 TFLOPS

GPU Benchmarks

Blender GPU 810 1661
Solar Bay 15241 23170
Expected FPS based on average performance across 9 popular games. Details

RAM

RAM size
Channels 1x8 GB 3x6 GB
Clock 5600 MHz 6400 MHz
Type DDR5 LPDDR5
Upgradable Yes No
Total slots 1 -
Max. ram size 24 GB -

Storage

Storage size
Bus PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x) Custom
Storage type SSD (M2) SSD (M2)
Channels 1x512 GB 2x256 GB
Upgradable Yes No
Total slots 2 -
NVMe Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers 2.0 4.2 (4 tweeters and 2 woofers)
Power 2x2W -
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Loudness ~84 dB ~84.3 dB
Microphones 2 3

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard v6E v6E
Bluetooth v5.3 v5.3
Fingerprint No Yes
Infrared sensor Yes No
Optical drive No No
Webcam Above the display Above the display
Webcam resolution 2560 x 1440 1920 x 1080
Ports
USB-A 2x USB 3.2 No
USB Type-C 2x USB 3.2 3x USB 4.0
Thunderbolt Thunderbolt 4 Thunderbolt 4
HDMI 1x HDMI 2.1 1x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort No No
VGA No No
Audio jack (3.5 mm) Yes Yes
Ethernet (RJ45) Yes No
SD card reader Yes Yes
Proprietary charging port Yes Yes

Input

Keyboard
Keyboard type Island Island
Numpad Yes No
Backlight Yes Yes
Key travel 1.4 mm 1 mm
Touchpad
Size - 15.5 x 9.9 cm
Surface Plastic Glass
Windows Precision Yes No
Further details
Notes on MacBook Pro 16 (M3, 2023):
    - Lower-end M3 Pro and M3 Max SoCs with fewer CPU and GPU cores are also available. Our tests are conducted on the maxed-out variants.
*Disclaimer! Ports, speakers, display, and other specifications can vary depending on the laptop's specific configuration or region.

Cast your vote

So, which laptop would you choose?
12 (85.7%)
2 (14.3%)
Total votes: 14

Comments

Write your opinion about the comparison of Apple MacBook Pro 16 (M3, 2023) and Asus Vivobook Pro 15 OLED (Q533/N6506) or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Consumer April 1, 2024 at 12:46 AM
Macbook M3 Pro 16 Pros and Cons: + Better maxed-out specs(8TB SSD, 128 GB unified memory) + Better all-around product finish and feel + Better audio + Battery lasts a long time - Expensive - Delicate screen and non-upgradeable - The 16-inch size is a tad too big for carrying in a backpack Asus Vivobook 15 Pros and Cons: + Upgradeable components + 15-inch perfect fit for most backpacks + More ports + Affordable + Hits right on my budget ($1999 for almost the top trim, except no 2TB SSD) + Above average performance at it's price range (>$2K) - Plastic touchpad feels cheap - Not as sleek & slim as a Macbook - Lasts shorter on a single charge
+14 Reply