Home > Laptop comparison > Omen 16 Slim or Nitro Lite 16 – what's better?

HP Omen 16 Slim vs Acer Nitro Lite 16

49 out of 100
HP Omen 16 Slim
VS
43 out of 100
Acer Nitro Lite 16
HP Omen 16 Slim
Acer Nitro Lite 16
Please select specific configurations for the laptops to get a more accurate comparative review
Display
1920 x 1200
CPU
GPU
RAM
Storage

Review

Evaluation of HP Omen 16 Slim and Acer Nitro Lite 16 important characteristics
Performance
System and application performance
Gaming
Performance in popular 3D games
Display
Viewing angle, color accuracy, brightness
Battery Life
Potential battery life in light and average use
Connectivity
Ports, webcam and other interfaces
Portability
Design, materials, durability and usability
NanoReview Score
Pick the usage scenario that best matches your needs
Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Please input up-to-date prices for the selected laptop configurations to get an accurate value-for-money index.
Currency
VS
27.8
(Mediocre)
Value Index
28.2
(Mediocre)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between the notebooks
Advantages of the HP Omen 16 Slim
  • Around 93% better multi-core CPU performance in the Cinebench 2024 test
  • Includes an old-school USB-A port
  • Performs better (up to 39%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Can run popular games at about 14-20% higher FPS
  • Better webcam recording quality
Advantages of the Acer Nitro Lite 16
  • Higher screen refresh rate: 165 versus 144 Hz
  • Significantly easier to carry: weighs 470 grams less (around 1.04 lbs)
  • Thinner bezels and 7% higher screen-to-body ratio

Tests and Specifications

Comparison table of test results and technical specs
Laptop:
Omen 16 Slim
vs
Nitro Lite 16

Case

Weight 2.42 kg (5.34 lbs) 1.95 kg (4.3 lbs)
Dimensions 357.5 x 269 x 19.9-22.7 mm
14.07 x 10.59 x 0.78-0.89 inches		 362.2 x 248.47 x 22.9 mm
14.26 x 9.78 x 0.9 inches
Area 962 cm2 (149 inches2) 900 cm2 (139.5 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio ~77.2% ~82.5%
Side bezels 6.4 mm 8.8 mm
Colors Black White, Black
Material Top: Aluminum
Middle: Plastic
Bottom: Plastic
Plastic
Transformer No No
Size comparison
Cooling solution
Cooling system Active Active
Vapor chamber No No
Liquid metal No No
Number of fans 2 2

Display

Size 16 inches 16 inches
Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Refresh rate 144 Hz 165 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-144 Hz) No
PPI 142 ppi 142 ppi
Aspect ratio 16:10 16:10
Resolution 1920 x 1200 pixels 1920 x 1200 pixels
HDR support No No
Touchscreen No No
Coating Matte Matte
Ambient light sensor No No
Display tests
sRGB color space 62.5% -
Response time 3 ms -
Max. brightness

Battery

Capacity
Battery type Li-Po -
Replaceable No No
Fast charging Yes Yes
Charging via USB (Power Delivery) Yes Yes, 65 W
Charging port position Left, Bottom Left
Charge power 150 W 0 W

CPU

CPU name
Base frequency 1.7 GHz 2.1 GHz
Turbo frequency 4.9 GHz 4.6 GHz
Cores 14 (4P + 10E) 8 (4P + 4E)
Threads 14 12
L3 Cache 18 MB 12 MB
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics 130T Intel UHD Graphics (48EU)
Fabrication process 3 nm 10 nm

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Omen 16 Slim +23%
2779
Nitro Lite 16
2256
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Omen 16 Slim +41%
13432
Nitro Lite 16
9556
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)
Omen 16 Slim +93%
1021
Nitro Lite 16
528
Submit your benchmark results

Graphics Card

GPU name
TGP - 65 W
Type Dedicated Dedicated
Fabrication process 5 nm 8 nm
GPU base clock - 1237 MHz
GPU boost clock - 1500 MHz
FLOPS 7.7-13.6 TFLOPS 6.1 TFLOPS
Memory size 8 GB 6 GB
Memory type GDDR7 GDDR6
Memory bus 128 bit 128 bit
Memory speed ~24 Gbps 12 Gbps
Shading units (cores) 2560 2048
Texture mapping units (TMUs) 80 64
Raster operations pipelines (ROPs) 32 40
GPU performance 7.7-13.6 TFLOPS 6.1 TFLOPS

GPU Benchmarks

Steel Nomad Lite Score
Omen 16 Slim +39%
6560
Nitro Lite 16
4711
Blender GPU 1945 1088
Solar Bay 30152 19522
Expected FPS based on average performance across 9 popular games. Details
Add your GPU benchmark result

RAM

RAM size
Channels 2x8 GB 2x8 GB
Clock 5600 MHz 4800 MHz
Type DDR5 DDR5
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 2 2
Max. ram size 32 GB 32 GB

Storage

Storage size
Bus PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x) PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)
Storage type SSD (M2) SSD (M2)
Channels 1x512 GB 1x512 GB
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 2 -
NVMe Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers 2.0 2.0
Power 2x2W -
Dolby Atmos No No
Microphones 2 2

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard v7 v6
Bluetooth v5.4 v5
Fingerprint No No
Infrared sensor No No
Optical drive No No
Webcam Above the display Above the display
Webcam resolution 1920 x 1080 1280 x 720
Ports
USB-A 3x USB 3.2 2x USB 3.2
USB Type-C 1x USB 4.0 1x USB 4.0
Thunderbolt No Thunderbolt 4
HDMI 1x HDMI 2.1 1x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort No No
VGA No No
Audio jack (3.5 mm) Yes Yes
Ethernet (RJ45) Yes Yes
SD card reader No No
Proprietary charging port Yes No

Input

Keyboard
Keyboard type Island Island
Numpad Yes Yes
Backlight Yes Yes
Touchpad
Surface Plastic Plastic
Windows Precision Yes Yes
*Disclaimer! Ports, speakers, display, and other specifications can vary depending on the laptop's specific configuration or region.

Cast your vote

So, which laptop would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

Related Comparisons

1. Acer Nitro Lite 16 vs Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-71)
2. Acer Nitro Lite 16 vs MSI Thin 15
3. Acer Nitro Lite 16 vs Lenovo Legion 5i Gen 9 (2024)
4. Acer Nitro Lite 16 vs Asus V16 (V3607)
5. Acer Nitro Lite 16 vs Acer Nitro 16 (AN16-42)
6. HP Omen 16 Slim vs HP Omen Max 16
7. HP Omen 16 Slim vs Acer Nitro V 16 (ANV16-71)
8. HP Omen 16 Slim vs HP Omen 16 (2024)
9. HP Omen 16 Slim vs HP Omen Transcend 16
10. HP Omen 16 Slim vs Acer Nitro 16 (AN16-42)
Compare other laptops (1100+)

Comments

Write your opinion about the comparison of Acer Nitro Lite 16 and HP Omen 16 Slim or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский