Home > Laptop comparison > Pulse 16 AI (2024) or Crosshair 16 HX (2024) – what's better?

MSI Pulse 16 AI (2024) vs Crosshair 16 HX (2024)

59 out of 100
MSI Pulse 16 AI (2024)
VS
61 out of 100
MSI Crosshair 16 HX (2024)
MSI Pulse 16 AI (2024)
MSI Crosshair 16 HX (2024)
Please select specific configurations for the laptops to get a more accurate comparative review
GPU
RAM
Storage

Review

Evaluation of MSI Pulse 16 AI (2024) and Crosshair 16 HX (2024) important characteristics
Performance
System and application performance
Gaming
Performance in popular 3D games
Display
Viewing angle, color accuracy, brightness
Battery Life
Potential battery life in light and average use
Connectivity
Ports, webcam and other interfaces
Portability
Design, materials, durability and usability
NanoReview Score
Pick the usage scenario that best matches your needs
Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Please input up-to-date prices for the selected laptop configurations to get an accurate value-for-money index.
Currency
VS

Key Differences

What are the key differences between the notebooks
Advantages of the MSI Crosshair 16 HX (2024)
  • Around 27% better multi-core CPU performance in the Cinebench 2024 test

Tests and Specifications

Comparison table of test results and technical specs
Laptop:
Pulse 16 AI (2024)
vs
Crosshair 16 HX (2024)

Case

Weight 2.5 kg (5.51 lbs) 2.5 kg (5.51 lbs)
Dimensions 359 x 266.4 x 21.8-27.9 mm
14.13 x 10.49 x 0.86-1.1 inches		 359 x 266.4 x 21.8-27.9 mm
14.13 x 10.49 x 0.86-1.1 inches
Area 956 cm2 (148.2 inches2) 956 cm2 (148.2 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio ~77.6% ~77.6%
Side bezels 7.2 mm 7.2 mm
Colors Black Gray
Material Plastic Plastic
Transformer No No
Opening angle 180° 180°
Size comparison
Cooling solution
Cooling system Active Active
Vapor chamber No No
Liquid metal No No
Number of fans 2 2

Display

Size 16 inches 16 inches
Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Refresh rate 240 Hz 240 Hz
PPI 189 ppi 189 ppi
Aspect ratio 16:10 16:10
Resolution 2560 x 1600 pixels 2560 x 1600 pixels
HDR support No No
Sync technology No No
Touchscreen No No
Coating Matte Matte
Ambient light sensor No No
Display tests
DCI-P3 color gamut 100% 100%

Battery

Capacity
Full charging time 2:00 hr -
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Fast charging Yes Yes
Charging via USB (Power Delivery) Yes Yes
Charging port position Left, Bottom Left, Bottom
Charge power 240 W 240 W

CPU

CPU name
Base frequency 2.3 GHz 2.1 GHz
Turbo frequency 5.1 GHz 5.5 GHz
Cores 16 (6P + 10E) 20 (8P + 12E)
Threads 22 28
L3 Cache 24 MB 33 MB
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics (8-Cores) Intel UHD Graphics (32EU)
Fabrication process 7 nm 10 nm

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)
Submit your benchmark results

Graphics Card

GPU name
TGP 140 W 140 W
Nvidia Optimus MUX MUX
Type Dedicated Dedicated
Fabrication process 5 nm 5 nm
GPU base clock 2295 MHz 2295 MHz
GPU boost clock 2370 MHz 2370 MHz
FLOPS 16 TFLOPS 16 TFLOPS
Memory size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory bus 128 bit 128 bit
Memory speed ~16 Gbps ~16 Gbps
Shading units (cores) 3072 3072
Texture mapping units (TMUs) 96 96
Raster operations pipelines (ROPs) 48 48
GPU performance 16 TFLOPS 16 TFLOPS

GPU Benchmarks

Steel Nomad Lite Score
Blender GPU 3757 3490
Solar Bay 47364 50155
Expected FPS based on average performance across 9 popular games. Details
Add your GPU benchmark result

RAM

RAM size
Channels 2x8 GB 2x8 GB
Clock 5600 MHz 5600 MHz
Type DDR5 DDR5
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 2 2
Max. ram size 96 GB 96 GB

Storage

Storage size
Bus PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x) PCI-E Gen 5.0 (4x)
Storage type SSD (M2) SSD (M2)
Channels 1x1024 GB 1x1024 GB
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 2 2
NVMe Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers 2.0 2.0
Power 2x2W 2x2W
Dolby Atmos No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard v6E v6E
Bluetooth v5.3 v5.3
Fingerprint No No
Infrared sensor No No
Optical drive No No
Webcam Above the display Above the display
Webcam resolution 1280 x 720 1280 x 720
Ports
USB-A 3x USB 3.2 3x USB 3.2
USB Type-C 1x USB 3.2 1x USB 3.2
Thunderbolt No No
HDMI 1x HDMI 2.1 1x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort No No
VGA No No
Audio jack (3.5 mm) Yes Yes
Ethernet (RJ45) Yes Yes
SD card reader No No
Proprietary charging port Yes Yes

Input

Keyboard
Keyboard type Island Island
Numpad Yes Yes
Backlight Yes Yes
Touchpad
Surface Plastic Plastic
Windows Precision Yes Yes
*Disclaimer! Ports, speakers, display, and other specifications can vary depending on the laptop's specific configuration or region.

Cast your vote

So, which laptop would you choose?
2 (15.4%)
11 (84.6%)
Total votes: 13

Related Comparisons

1. MSI Pulse 16 AI (2024) vs Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (PHN14-51)
2. MSI Pulse 16 AI (2024) vs MSI Sword 16 HX (2024)
3. MSI Crosshair 16 HX (2024) vs Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (PHN16-72)
4. MSI Crosshair 16 HX (2024) vs MSI Sword 16 HX (2024)
5. MSI Crosshair 16 HX (2024) vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024) GU605
Compare other laptops (1100+)

Comments

Write your opinion about the comparison of MSI Crosshair 16 HX (2024) and Pulse 16 AI (2024) or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
LaptopDealsEU October 2, 2024 at 08:39 AM
Pulse is a higher series than Crosshair. Even though the build quality is better. Crosshair is made entirely of plastic. In addition, the silent mode on Crosshair is not usable. Only 20W on the GPU and 43dB. People who vote for Crosshair are looking only at the specifications.
+2 Reply
EnglishРусский