Razer Blade 16 (2025) vs Blade 16

62 out of 100
Razer Blade 16 (2025)
VS
64 out of 100
Razer Blade 16
Please select specific configurations for the laptops to get a more accurate comparative review
Display
CPU
Intel Core i9 13950HX
GPU
RAM
Storage

Review

Evaluation of Razer Blade 16 (2025) and Blade 16 important characteristics
Performance
System and application performance
Gaming
Performance in popular 3D games
Display
Viewing angle, color accuracy, brightness
Battery Life
Potential battery life in light and average use
Connectivity
Ports, webcam and other interfaces
Portability
Design, materials, durability and usability
NanoReview Score
Pick the usage scenario that best matches your needs
Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Please input up-to-date prices for the selected laptop configurations to get an accurate value-for-money index.
Currency
VS
20.2
(Mediocre)
Value Index
25.5
(Mediocre)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between the notebooks
Advantages of the Razer Blade 16 (2025)
  • Easier to carry: weighs 350 grams less (around 0.77 lbs)
  • Can run popular games at about 8-11% higher FPS
Advantages of the Razer Blade 16
  • Around 2.2x better multi-core CPU performance in the Cinebench 2024 test
  • Thinner bezels and 4% higher screen-to-body ratio
  • Features a a little bigger (~6%) battery – 95.2 against 90 watt-hours
  • User-upgradable RAM (up to 64GB)
  • Provides 25% higher max. screen brightness: 500 vs 400 nits

Tests and Specifications

Comparison table of test results and technical specs

Case

Weight 2.1 kg (4.63 lbs) 2.45 kg (5.4 lbs)
Dimensions 359.8 x 250.5 x 14.9-17.4 mm
14.17 x 9.86 x 0.59-0.69 inches
355 x 244 x 21.99 mm
13.98 x 9.61 x 0.87 inches
Area 901 cm2 (139.7 inches2) 866 cm2 (134.3 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio ~82.4% ~85.7%
Side bezels 7.6 mm 5.2 mm
Colors Black White, Black
Material Aluminum Aluminum
Transformer No No
Opening angle 135° 140°
Size comparison
Cooling solution
Cooling system Active Active
Vapor chamber Yes Yes
Liquid metal No No
Number of fans 2 2
Max. fan speed (RPM) 5300 RPM -
Noise level (max. load) 53.4 dB 51.3 dB

Display

Size 16 inches 16 inches
Type OLED IPS LCD
Refresh rate 240 Hz 240 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No -
PPI 189 ppi 189 ppi
Aspect ratio 16:10 16:10
Resolution 2560 x 1600 pixels 2560 x 1600 pixels
HDR support Yes, HDR10 No
Sync technology Adaptive Sync G-Sync
Touchscreen No No
Coating Matte Matte
Ambient light sensor - No
Display tests
Contrast 1000000:1 1305:1
sRGB color space 100% 100%
Adobe RGB profile 97.8% 89.7%
DCI-P3 color gamut 100% 98.5%
Response time 1 ms 9 ms
Max. brightness
400 nits
Blade 16 +25%
500 nits

Battery

Capacity
Full charging time 2:55 hr 1:45 hr
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Fast charging Yes Yes
Charging via USB (Power Delivery) Yes, 100 W Yes
Charging port position Left, Right Left, Right
Charge power 280 W 240 / 280 / 330 W
Weight of AC adapter 795 grams 804 / 959 grams

CPU

CPU name
Base frequency 2.0 GHz 2.2 GHz
Turbo frequency 5 GHz 5.5 GHz
Cores 8 (4P + 4E) 24 (8P + 16E)
Threads 16 32
L3 Cache 16 MB 36 MB
Integrated GPU Radeon 860M Intel UHD Graphics (32EU)
Fabrication process 4 nm 10 nm

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Blade 16 +3%
3014
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Blade 16 +21%
16817
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Blade 16 +12%
133
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)
Blade 16 +120%
2009

Graphics Card

GPU name
TGP 115 W 140 W
Nvidia Optimus MUX MUX
Type Dedicated Dedicated
Fabrication process 4 nm 5 nm
GPU base clock - 2295 MHz
GPU boost clock - 2370 MHz
FLOPS 18.4 TFLOPS 16 TFLOPS
Memory size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type GDDR7 GDDR6
Memory bus 128 bit 128 bit
Memory speed ~24 Gbps ~16 Gbps
Shading units (cores) 3328 3072
Texture mapping units (TMUs) 104 96
Raster operations pipelines (ROPs) 48 48
GPU performance 18.4 TFLOPS 16 TFLOPS

GPU Benchmarks

Steel Nomad Lite Score
12365
11133
Blender GPU 3595 3661
Solar Bay 51855 45994
Expected FPS based on average performance across 9 popular games. Details

RAM

RAM size
Channels 2x8 GB 2x8 GB
Clock 8000 MHz 5600 MHz
Type LPDDR5X DDR5
Upgradable No Yes
Total slots - 2
Max. ram size - 64 GB

Storage

Storage size
Bus PCI-E Gen 5.0 (4x) PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)
Storage type SSD (M2) SSD (M2)
Channels 1x1024 GB 1x1024 GB
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 2 2
NVMe Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers 4.2 (4 tweeters and 2 woofers) 2.2 (2 tweeters and 2 woofers)
Power - 4x2W
Dolby Atmos No Yes
Loudness ~82.1 dB ~88.2 dB
Microphones 2 2

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard v7 v6E
Bluetooth v5.4 v5.2
Fingerprint No No
Infrared sensor Yes Yes
Optical drive No No
Webcam Above the display Above the display
Webcam resolution 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080
Ports
USB-A 3x USB 3.2 3x USB 3.2
USB Type-C 2x USB 4.0 2x USB 4.0
Thunderbolt Thunderbolt 4 Thunderbolt 4
HDMI 1x HDMI 2.1 1x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort No No
VGA No No
Audio jack (3.5 mm) Yes Yes
Ethernet (RJ45) No No
SD card reader Yes Yes
Proprietary charging port Yes Yes

Input

Keyboard
Keyboard type Island Island
Numpad No No
Backlight Yes Yes
Key travel 1.5 mm 1 mm
Touchpad
Size 15.0 x 9.7 cm 17.0 x 9.7 cm
Surface Glass Glass
Windows Precision Yes Yes
*Disclaimer! Ports, speakers, display, and other specifications can vary depending on the laptop's specific configuration or region.

Cast your vote

So, which laptop would you choose?
1 (16.7%)
5 (83.3%)
Total votes: 6

Comments

Write your opinion about the comparison of Razer Blade 16 and Blade 16 (2025) or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!