Razer Blade 18 (2025) vs HP Omen 17 (2024)

Please select specific configurations for the laptops to get a more accurate comparative review
Display
CPU Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
GPU
RAM
Storage

Review

Evaluation of Razer Blade 18 (2025) and HP Omen 17 (2024) important characteristics
Performance
System and application performance
Gaming
Performance in popular 3D games
Display
Viewing angle, color accuracy, brightness
Battery Life
Potential battery life in light and average use
Connectivity
Ports, webcam and other interfaces
Portability
Design, materials, durability and usability
NanoReview Score
Pick the usage scenario that best matches your needs
Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Please input up-to-date prices for the selected laptop configurations to get an accurate value-for-money index.
Currency
VS
31.3
(Mediocre)
Value Index
22.5
(Mediocre)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between the notebooks
Advantages of the Razer Blade 18 (2025)
  • Higher screen refresh rate: 300 versus 144 Hz
  • Can run popular games at about 266-363% higher FPS
  • Performs significantly better (up to 3.9x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Around 2.8x better multi-core CPU performance in the Cinebench 2024 test
  • Higher number of cutting-edge USB Type-C ports: 2 versus 1
  • Thinner bezels and 14% higher screen-to-body ratio
  • Features a a little bigger (~10%) battery – 91.7 against 83 watt-hours
  • Better webcam recording quality
  • Provides 67% higher max. screen brightness: 500 vs 300 nits
  • 32% sharper screen – 168 versus 127 pixels per inch (PPI)
Advantages of the HP Omen 17 (2024)
  • Slightly easier to carry: weighs 150 grams less (around 0.33 lbs)

Tests and Specifications

Comparison table of test results and technical specs

Case

Weight 3.1 kg (6.84 lbs) 2.95 kg (6.5 lbs)
Dimensions 399.96 x 275.4 x 21.99-27.94 mm
15.75 x 10.84 x 0.87-1.1 inches
397.5 x 277.9 x 27.5-30 mm
15.65 x 10.94 x 1.08-1.18 inches
Area 1101 cm2 (170.7 inches2) 1105 cm2 (171.2 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio ~85.3% ~74.7%
Side bezels 6.1 mm 7.3 mm
Colors Black Black
Material Aluminum Top: Aluminum
Middle: Plastic
Bottom: Plastic
Transformer No No
Opening angle - 180°
Size comparison
Cooling solution
Cooling system Active Active
Vapor chamber Yes No
Liquid metal No No
Number of fans 3 2
Noise level (max. load) 66.3 dB -

Display

Size 18 inches 17.3 inches
Type Mini LED IPS LCD
Refresh rate 300 Hz 144 Hz
PPI 168 ppi 127 ppi
Aspect ratio 16:10 16:9
Resolution 2560 x 1600 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels
HDR support - No
Sync technology G-Sync FreeSync
Touchscreen No No
Coating Matte Matte
Ambient light sensor - No
Screen space comparison
Blade 18 (2025)
18″ (16:10 ratio) = 145.6 in2
Omen 17 (2024)
17.3″ (16:9 ratio) = 127.9 in2
~13% more screen space
Display tests
Contrast 1000000:1 -
sRGB color space - 100%
Response time - 7 ms
Max. brightness
500 nits
300 nits

Battery

Capacity
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Fast charging Yes Yes
Charging via USB (Power Delivery) Yes, 100 W Yes
Charging port position Left, Right Bottom
Charge power 330 W 230 W
Weight of AC adapter 1230 grams -

CPU

CPU name
Base frequency 2.7 GHz 4.3 GHz
Turbo frequency 5.4 GHz 5 GHz
Cores 24 (8P + 16E) 6
Threads 24 12
L3 Cache 36 MB 16 MB
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics (4-Cores) Radeon 760M
Fabrication process 3 nm 4 nm

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
22639
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)

Graphics Card

GPU name
TGP 175 W 0 W
Nvidia Optimus MUX Yes, Advanced Optimus
Type Dedicated Dedicated
Fabrication process 4 nm 5 nm
FLOPS 37.4 TFLOPS 6.4 TFLOPS
Memory size 12 GB 6 GB
Memory type GDDR7 GDDR6
Memory bus 192 bit 96 bit
Memory speed ~28 Gbps ~16 Gbps
Shading units (cores) 5888 2560
Texture mapping units (TMUs) 184 80
Raster operations pipelines (ROPs) 80 32
GPU performance 37.4 TFLOPS 6.4 TFLOPS

GPU Benchmarks

Steel Nomad Lite Score
21942
Blender GPU 5941 1856
Solar Bay 89297 26493
Expected FPS based on average performance across 9 popular games. Details

RAM

RAM size
Channels 2x16 GB 1x8 GB
Clock 5600 MHz 5600 MHz
Type DDR5 DDR5
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 2 2
Max. ram size 64 GB 32 GB

Storage

Storage size
Bus PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x) PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)
Storage type SSD (M2) SSD (M2)
Channels 1x1024 GB 1x512 GB
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 2 2
NVMe Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers 4.2 (4 tweeters and 2 woofers) 2.0
Power - 2x2W
Dolby Atmos No No
Loudness ~82.1 dB -
Microphones 2 2

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard v7 v6E
Bluetooth v5.4 v5.3
Fingerprint No No
Infrared sensor Yes No
Optical drive No No
Webcam Above the display Above the display
Webcam resolution 2560 x 1440 1920 x 1080
Ports
USB-A 3x USB 3.2 3x USB 3.2
USB Type-C 2x USB 4.0 1x USB 3.2
Thunderbolt Thunderbolt 5 No
HDMI 1x HDMI 2.1 1x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort No No
VGA No No
Audio jack (3.5 mm) Yes Yes
Ethernet (RJ45) Yes Yes
SD card reader Yes No
Proprietary charging port Yes Yes

Input

Keyboard
Keyboard type Island Island
Numpad Yes Yes
Backlight Yes Yes
Key travel 1.5 mm -
Touchpad
Surface Glass Plastic
Windows Precision Yes Yes
Further details
Notes on Blade 18 (2025):
    - The 4K display supports two modes: UHD at 240 Hz and FHD at 440 Hz.
    - It has two Thunderbolt ports: one is 5.0, the other 4.0.
*Disclaimer! Ports, speakers, display, and other specifications can vary depending on the laptop's specific configuration or region.

Cast your vote

So, which laptop would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

Comments

Write your opinion about the comparison of HP Omen 17 (2024) and Razer Blade 18 (2025) or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!