Honor 400 vs 200 Pro
69
out of 100
VS
72
out of 100
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.55-inch Honor 400 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3) that was released on May 22, 2025, against the Honor 200 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 and came out 1 year before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Honor 400
- Shows 12% longer battery life (23:16 vs 20:51 hours)
- Delivers 39% higher peak brightness (1541 against 1110 nits)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Water-resistant body (IP66 classification)
- Comes with 800 mAh larger battery capacity: 6000 vs 5200 mAh
- The phone is 1 year newer
- Weighs 15 grams less
Reasons to consider the Honor 200 Pro
- The rear camera has a 2.5x optical zoom
- 56% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1698K versus 1087K)
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Handles wireless charging up to 66W
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 80W)
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
- 60% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1820 and 1136 points
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.55 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2736 pixels | 1224 x 2700 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.85:9 |
| PPI | 460 ppi | 437 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1600 nits | 1200 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 5000 nits | 4000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Aluminosilicate glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.2% | 90.8% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | - | 99.8% |
| PWM | - | 60 Hz |
| Response time | - | 2 ms |
| Contrast | - | ∞ Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 156.5 mm (6.16 inches) | 163.3 mm (6.43 inches) |
| Width | 74.6 mm (2.94 inches) | 75.2 mm (2.96 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm (0.29 inches) | 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP66 | IP65 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Black, Silver, Gold, Blue | White, Black, Blue, Pink |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Good (3.63/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Very good (B) · 180 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 2630 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510) - 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715) - 1 core at 2.63 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715) |
- 3 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 4 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 720 | Adreno 735 |
| GPU shading units | 512 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 975 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~998.4 GFLOPS | ~1689.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 4060 | 8821 |
| Single-core score | 1136 | 1820 |
| Multi-core score | 3107 | 4579 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 403084 | 516831 |
| GPU | 207834 | 495795 |
| Memory | 216538 | 270542 |
| UX | 260069 | 414892 |
| Total score | 1087525 | 1698060 |
| Samples | [32 tests] | [16 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 60% |
| Graphics test | - | 7 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 998 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 17 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 19 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 17 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 14 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 4494 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 15496 |
| Video editing | - | 7821 |
| Photo editing | - | 29476 |
| Data manipulation | - | 12021 |
| Writing score | - | 16099 |
Recent User Tests
Honor 400
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-08-11 (Baclaven) | AnTuTu | 947758 |
| 📘 2026-07-15 (Iulitic211Rg) | AnTuTu | 1102591 |
| 📘 2026-07-04 (TheOdin) | AnTuTu | 1098513 |
| 📘 2026-06-08 (brozzlex) | AnTuTu | 1089031 |
| 📘 2026-06-02 (ElijaHaH) | GeekBench GPU | 3475 |
Honor 200 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-08 (ChenTH) | AnTuTu | 1573533 |
| 📘 2026-06-07 (Dimik) | AnTuTu | 1768071 |
| 📘 2026-05-26 (Jason) | AnTuTu | 1633389 |
| 📘 2026-04-25 (Олег) | AnTuTu | 1801694 |
| 📘 2026-03-29 (Fenrir) | AnTuTu | 1421683 |
Memory
| RAM size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | MagicOS 10 | MagicOS 10 |
| OS size | - | 55 GB |
| OS updates | 6 years | 4 years |
| Security updates | 6 years | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6000 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 80 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes (66 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (80% in 30 min) | Yes (75% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:41 hr | 0:45 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1200 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 09:20 hr | 10:55 hr |
| Watching video | 12:17 hr | 08:13 hr |
| Gaming | 05:43 hr | 05:51 hr |
| Standby | 121 hr | 99 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 16384 x 12288 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 2.5x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Angle of widest lens | 112° | 112° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | OmniVision OV50H |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) | 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.56 micron | 1.2 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | - | 50 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | - | 68 mm |
| Sensor | - | Sony IMX856 |
| Stabilization | - | Optical |
| Image resolution | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | - | 16 mm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | - | 70 |
| Preview | - | 69 |
| Zoom | - | 132 |
| Samples | - | Photo samples of Honor 200 Pro from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | - | 21 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | - | 20 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | May 2025 | May 2024 |
| Release date | May 2025 | May 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $699 |
| Successor | - Honor 500 | - Honor 500 Pro |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 100 W | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the performance, gaming, connectivity, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Honor 200 Pro. But if the display and battery life are more of a priority – go for the Honor 400.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 204
Related comparisons
2.
Honor 200 Pro vs Honor 200 (2)
8.
Honor 400 vs Honor 200 (4)