Huawei Pura 90s Pro vs Honor 600 Pro
79
out of 100
VS
89
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.6-inch Huawei Pura 90s Pro (with HiSilicon Kirin 9030S) that was released on July 14, 2026, against the Honor 600 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 3 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Huawei Pura 90s Pro
- The rear camera has a 4x optical zoom
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
Reasons to consider the Honor 600 Pro
- 2.4x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3038K versus 1273K)
- Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 66W)
- More energy-efficient CPU β Snapdragon 8 Elite
- 2.3x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3058 and 1319 points
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | OLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.6 inches | 6.57 inches |
| Resolution | 1256 x 2760 pixels | 1264 x 2728 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | - | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 460 ppi | 458 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | - | 1800 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | - | 8000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | - | 360 Hz |
| Screen protection | Kunlun Glass 2 | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7% | 90.9% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 157.8 mm (6.21 inches) | 156 mm (6.14 inches) |
| Width | 74.5 mm (2.93 inches) | 74.7 mm (2.94 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) | 7.8 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 213.5 g (7.53 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Pink, Orange, Purple | White, Black, Orange |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 9030S | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Max clock | 2700 MHz | 4470 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.62 GHz: Taishan v124 Little - 3 cores at 2.15 GHz: Taishan v124 Mid - 1 core at 2.7 GHz: Taishan v124 Big |
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M) - 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | SMIC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 5 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Da Vinci | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Maleoon 935F | Adreno 830 |
| GPU shading units | 768 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 933 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~1433.1 GFLOPS | ~3379.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 3442 | 23977 |
| Single-core score | 1319 | 3058 |
| Multi-core score | 4470 | 9377 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 475726 | 968049 |
| GPU | 246367 | 1129416 |
| Memory | 279480 | 325572 |
| UX | 271473 | 615436 |
| Total score | 1273046 | 3038473 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [3 tests] |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#94th place)
Recent User Tests
Huawei Pura 90s Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-07 -> interno | AnTuTu | 1273046 |
Honor 600 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-31 (thor) | AnTuTu | 3101294 |
| π 2026-08-17 (FuSi) | AnTuTu | 2975404 |
| π 2026-07-20 (JIUCH) | AnTuTu | 3104319 |
| π 2026-06-04 (Alexis) | AnTuTu | 3038473 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | - | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| ROM | EMUI 16 | MagicOS 10 |
| OS updates | - | 6 years |
| Security updates | - | 6 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6000 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 66 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | - | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (71% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 0:48 hr |
| Web browsing | - | 11:25 hr |
| Watching video | - | 19:55 hr |
| Gaming | - | 08:33 hr |
| Standby | - | 136 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#48th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 200 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 16384 x 12288 |
| Zoom | Optical, 4x | Optical, 3.5x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (1080p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | - | 112Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12.5 MP |
1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.4 - 4.0 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | - |
| Sensor | - | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28" (β 0.78 inch) | 1/1.4" (β 0.71 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.56 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.1 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length | 91 mm | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28" (β 0.78 inch) | - |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 12.5 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 13 mm | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 13 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | July 2026 | April 2026 |
| Release date | August 2026 | April 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $999 |
| Sensors | - Hall-effect sensor - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Face recognition sensor - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 66 W | Yes, 80 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Honor 600 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 43