Motorola Edge 70 Pro Plus vs Huawei Nova 16s Pro

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.8-inch Motorola Edge 70 Pro Plus (with MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Extreme) that was released on June 1, 2026, against the Huawei Nova 16s Pro, which is powered by HiSilicon Kirin 9010S and came out 3 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory 12 / 256 GB

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Motorola Edge 70 Pro Plus
  • 2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2366K versus 1158K)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Handles wireless charging up to 15W
  • More energy-efficient CPU – Dimensity 8500 Extreme
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • 21% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1743 and 1446 points
  • Weighs 28 grams less
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Huawei Nova 16s Pro
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • The rear camera has a 3.7x optical zoom
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
  • Has a built-in infrared port

Review

Evaluation of Motorola Edge 70 Pro Plus and Huawei Nova 16s Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.8 inches 6.84 inches
Resolution 1272 x 2772 pixels 1320 x 2856 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.6:9 19.5:9
PPI 450 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1800 nits -
Max rated brightness in HDR 5200 nits 6000 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 360 Hz 300 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 7i Kunlun Glass
Screen-to-body ratio 92% 90.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming

Design and build

Height 162.7 mm (6.41 inches) 163 mm (6.42 inches)
Width 75.6 mm (2.98 inches) 78 mm (3.07 inches)
Thickness 7.19 mm (0.28 inches) 7.1 mm (0.28 inches)
Weight 190 g (6.7 oz) 218 g (7.69 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Eco-leather Glass
Frame material Plastic Metal
Colors Green, Red, Brown Black, Blue, Pink
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Motorola Edge 70 Pro Plus and Huawei Nova 16s Pro
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Extreme HiSilicon Kirin 9010S
Max clock 3400 MHz 2500 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 4 cores at 1.55 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 3 cores at 2.18 GHz: TaiShan V121
- 1 core at 2.3 GHz: TaiShan V121
L3 cache 6 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC SMIC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 7 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 880 Da Vinci
GPU
Graphics Mali-G720 MP8 Maleoon 920
GPU shading units 1024 1024
GPU clock 1508 MHz 750 MHz
FLOPS ~3088.4 GFLOPS ~1536 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Motorola Edge 70 Pro Plus and Huawei Nova 16s Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
14605
Compute Score (GPU) 14605 2322
Single-core score 1743 1446
Multi-core score 6900 4426
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2366913
1158674
CPU 708437 308118
GPU 812170 268652
Memory 317102 381445
UX 529204 200459
Total score 2366913 1158674
Samples Less than 3 Less than 3
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#176th place)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android
ROM - EMUI 16
OS updates 3 years -
Security updates 5 years -

Battery

Capacity 6500 mAh 7000 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 100 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (15 W) No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes
Bypass charging No -
Fast charging Yes Yes

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 200 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 12288 x 16384
Zoom Optical, 3.5x Optical, 3.7x
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 120 FPS (1080p) -
Angle of widest lens 122° 118°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Focal length 24 mm 18 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-710 -
Sensor size 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.5 f/2.6
Focal length 81 mm 88 mm
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 12 mm 13 mm
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) -
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/1.9 f/2.4
Focal length - 52 mm
Sensor CMOS -
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.5" (≈ 0.4 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced June 2026 September 2026
Release date June 2026 September 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $500 -
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Yes, 100 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Motorola Edge 70 Pro Plus. It has a better performance, gaming, connectivity, software, and sound.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!