Motorola Moto G75 5G vs Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.78-inch Motorola Moto G75 5G (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3) that was released on October 1, 2024, against the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL, which is powered by Google Tensor G4 and came out 2 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Motorola Moto G75 5G
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Reasons to consider the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • 2.1x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1672K versus 790K)
  • Has 2x more RAM: 16GB versus 8GB
  • More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 15
  • Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • 26% higher pixel density (486 vs 387 PPI)
  • OLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus UFS 2.2
  • Reverse charging feature
  • 2x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2001 and 1015 points

Review

Evaluation of Motorola Moto G75 5G and Google Pixel 9 Pro XL crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 128 GB
VS
16 / 128 GB
117.1
(Excellent)
Value Index
34.4
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type IPS LCD OLED
Size 6.78 inches 6.8 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2388 pixels 1344 x 2992 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 387 ppi 486 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1000 nits 3000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR - 2000 nits
HDR support No Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz -
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5 Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Screen-to-body ratio 86.5% 89.5%
Display features - DCI-P3 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space - 99%
PWM - 240 Hz
Response time - 2 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
2375 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 166.09 mm (6.54 inches) 162.8 mm (6.41 inches)
Width 77.24 mm (3.04 inches) 76.6 mm (3.02 inches)
Thickness 8.44 mm (0.33 inches) 8.5 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 208 g (7.34 oz) 221 g (7.8 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP68
Advanced cooling - Vapor chamber
Rear material Eco-leather Glass
Frame material Plastic Metal
Colors Gray, Blue, Green White, Black, Gray, Pink
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button Yes, in-display
Repairability Good (3.93/5) Good (3.34/5)
Drop resistance Very good (B) Β· 180 drops Excellent (A) Β· 270 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
86.5%
89.5%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Motorola Moto G75 5G and Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 Google Tensor G4
Max clock 2400 MHz 3100 MHz
CPU cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78
- 4 cores at 1.92 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.1 GHz: Cortex-X4
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 710 Mali-G715 MC7
GPU shading units 256 896
GPU clock 1010 MHz 940 MHz
FLOPS ~517.1 GFLOPS ~1684.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Motorola Moto G75 5G and Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2001
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
4932
Compute Score (GPU)
9185
Compute Score (GPU) 3366 9185
Single-core score 1015 2001
Multi-core score 2920 4932
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
790810
1672795
CPU 323354 622527
GPU 73987 410009
Memory 172164 255927
UX 221305 384332
Total score 790810 1672795
Samples [18 tests] [6 tests]

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Motorola Moto G75 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-10 (Chuy13)AnTuTu797635
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-08 (Zetina)AnTuTu797281
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-08 (Chuy13)AnTuTu784429
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-28 (THE FLASH)AnTuTu854615
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-18 (Zek.-)AnTuTu863717
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-27 (feraroof43)AnTuTu1626655
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-26 (Ark15)Battery lifeSOT 5:20 / 11:00
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Kazin)AnTuTu1723964
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-07 -> DeadlyKPSSAnTuTu1679233
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-29 (Actn)AnTuTu1585585

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 16 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 2133 MHz -
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1
Memory card MicroSD No
Memory card max size Up to 1024 GB -

Software

Operating system Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 17)
ROM Hello UI Stock Android
OS updates 5 years 7 years
Security updates 6 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 5060 mAh
Max charge power 30 W 37 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (15 W) Yes (12 W)
Reverse charging No Yes, (wireless)
Fast charging Yes (50% in 25 min) Yes (67% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:17 hr 1:18 hr
Battery cycles 1000 cycles 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 11:42 hr
Watching video - 10:46 hr
Gaming - 05:57 hr
Standby - 92 hr
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6144 8160 x 6144
Zoom Digital Optical, 5x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion - 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 119Β° 123Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 48 MP
3) Ultrawide: 48 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.7
Focal length - 25 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-600 Samsung GN1
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) 1/1.31" (β‰ˆ 0.76 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 1.2 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 48 MP
Aperture - f/2.8
Focal length - 113 mm
Sensor - Samsung S5KGM5
Sensor size - 1/2.55" (β‰ˆ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size - 0.7 micron
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/1.7
Focal length - 12 mm
Sensor - Samsung S5KGM5
Sensor size - 1/2.55" (β‰ˆ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh - 75
Preview - 86
Zoom - 155
Samples - Photo samples of Google Pixel 9 Pro XL from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 16 megapixels 42 megapixels
Image resolution - 3648 x 2736
Aperture f/2.5 f/2.2
Focal length - 17 mm
Sensor CMOS Sony IMX858
Sensor size - 1/2.51" (β‰ˆ 0.4 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 0.7 micron
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Galileo
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby -
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot Yes No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Mid-range Flagship
Announced October 2024 August 2024
Release date October 2024 August 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $299 $1099
Successor - Motorola Moto G77 - Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
SAR (head) - 0.99 W/kg
SAR (body) - 1.4 W/kg
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 30 W Not included
Further details
Notes on Moto G75 5G:
    - The plastic version of the smartphone is thinner (8.34 mm), and lighter (205 grams).
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!